Legends and Myths of Online Testing: The Truth is Out There

Authors

  • V. Yu. Grigorev Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Автор
  • S.E. Novikova Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-10-124-134

Keywords:

читерство, independent assessment of competencies, proctoring, cheating

Abstract

The article discusses the prospects of the remote format for assessing competencies through a comparative analysis with the development of classical chess, concludes that it is necessary to rethink the role and place of online testing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Добринская Д. Е., Мартыненко Т. С. Перспективы российского информационного общества: уровни цифрового разрыва // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология. 2019. № 1. С. 108-120.

King C. G., Guyette R. W., Piotrowski C. Online exams and cheating: An empirical analysis of business students' views // The Journal of Educators Online. 2009. N 6 (1). P. 1-11.

Fask A., Englander F., Wang Z. Do online exams facilitate cheating? An experiment designed to separate out possible cheating from the effect of the online test taking environment // Journal of Academic Ethics. 2014. N 12 (2). P. 101-112.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-15

Issue

No. 10 (2020)

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Grigorev V.Y., Novikova S. Legends and Myths of Online Testing: The Truth is Out There // Administrative Consulting. 2020. no. 10. P. 124–134. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-10-124-134