Scenario Modeling in Health System Management Perm Region (Part 1)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-2-110-126Keywords:
management decision, forecast, plan, scenario, risk, threat, probability, national economy, health care system, forthcoming (expected) life expectancy, econometric model, statistical estimation, random componentAbstract
The article is devoted to the problems of scenario modeling in relation to solving a number of problems of managing the health care system of the Perm Territory, which in recent years has attracted attention by the development of a number of promising projects to develop this industry, to expand the availability of medical services and to improve the level of medical care for the population. Since any good-quality project must be directly linked not only to the future periods of its implementation, but also be scientifically justified in terms of insuring all kinds of risks and threats that will stand in the way of the successful completion of the project, recently all kinds of projects, programs and plans are often developed are created using the so-called scenario approach. Several options for the development of events with this approach are offered to the appropriate circle of leaders or the power structure for the subsequent adoption of an appropriate management decision.The authors of the article consider the main provisions and principles of the scenario approach using the example of the development of the health care system of a particular subject of the federation, which makes the material proposed for consideration very relevant. The authors also define, as they see it, the main result of improving the industry in the form of a target and a national goal - the expected (upcoming) life expectancy of the population of the study area. This socio-economic indicator, which has all the signs of fatefulness, is considered by the authors to be a priority analytical indicator of the level and quality of an effective life of a Russian. The latter determines the purpose of this study.The authors consider the construction of dynamic multivariate models of industry development options for a period of up to three years to be an efficient tool for analyzing and forecasting this indicator, which is presented in the article in the form of five simultaneous equations of multiple regressions. The results of this construction are continued by discussion, and the article ends with the list of the conclusions. The authors also inform the reader about the further direction of their scientific research.Downloads
References
Валеахметов Н. И., Цацулин А. Н. Формирование инновационной стратегии развития предпринимательской структуры кластерного типа в регионе: монография / под ред. проф. А. Н. Цацулина. СПб.: Астерион, 2009. 230 с.
Глухов В. В., Колобов А. В., Игумнов Е. М. Методика оптимизации набора инструментов для повышения эффективности бизнес-системы // Научно-технические ведомости СПбПУ. Экономические науки. 2020. Т. 13. № 5. C. 95-105.
Квинт В. Л. Поиск и исследование философских корней теории стратегии. Взаимосвязь философского и стратегического мышления // Управленческое консультирование. 2016. № 1. С. 15-21.
Козырев А. А. Исследуя методологические основы стратегирования социально-экономического развития // Экономика в промышленности. 2020. Т. 13. № 4. С. 434-447.
Линдгрен М., Бандхольд Х. Сценарное планирование. Связь между будущим и стратегией / пер. с англ. М.: Олимп-Бизнес, 2009. 256 с.
Одинец В. П. Об истории некоторых математических методов, используемых при принятии управленческих решений. Сыктывкар: Изд-во СГУ им. Питирима Сорокина, 2015. 108 с.
Пoпoв С. А. Актуальный стратегический менеджмент. Видение - цели - изменения. М.: Юрайт, 2019. 452 с.
Рассел С., Норвиг П. Искусственный интеллект: современный подход, 2-е изд. / пер. с англ. М.: ИД "Вильямс", 2006. 1408 с.
Сафиуллин А. Р., Губайдуллина А. И. Моделирование сценариев повышения инвестиционной привлекательности обрабатывающей промышленности Республики Татарстан // Научнотехнические ведомости СПбГПУ. Экономические науки. 2020. Т. 13, № 4. С. 74-82.
Фукуяма Ф. Социальные последствия биотехнологических новаций / пер. с англ. // Человек. 2008. № 2. С. 80-99.
Aitken A. C. Statistical Mathematics / Browne Press. June 25. 2012. 160 p.
Bayes T., Price R. An Essay towards solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chance. By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes communicated by Mr. Price, in the letter to John Canton, and F. R. S. // Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London. N 53 (1763). P. 370-418.
Bradfield R., Wright G. The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning // Futures Research Quarterly. 2005. № 37. P. 795-812.
Feibenbaum E. A. On generality and problem solving // Machine Intelligence. Edinburgh University Press. 1971. N 6. P. 165.
Hawken P., Ogilvy James A., Schwartz P. Seven Tomorrows Paperback. February 1, 1982. Bantam Dell Pub Group. 235 p.
Kahn C. H. Essays on Being Oxford University Press, Feb 19 2009. Printed in the UK by the MPG Books Group. 236 p.
Murray S. L., Grantham K. Development of a Generic Risk Matrix to Manage Project Risks // Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering. 2011. N 5 (1). P. 35-51.
Schoemaker P. Scenario Planning / In book: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. University of Pennsylvania. January 2016. P. 1-9.
Easton V. J., McColl J. H. Statistics Glossary. 1997. V. 1.1, Steps: Hypothesis testing.
Zadeh L. A. Fuzzy sets // Information and Control. 1965. N 8. P. 338-353.
