Analysis of Trends in the Higher Education and Science as the Basis for Strategizing the Scientific and Innovative Activities in Regional Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-5-93-107Keywords:
strategy theory, methodology of strategizing, research and development, Kemerovo region - Kuzbass, OTSW-analysis, global, national and local trendsAbstract
Aim of the article is to identify global, national and local trends in the development of higher education and science, which should be taken into account when strategizing the scientific and innovative activities of a regional university (in the conditions of the Kemerovo region - Kuzbass).Materials and methods. The methodological and theoretical basis of the study is the theory of strategy and the strategy methodology developed by V. L. Kvint (Moscow State University named after M. V. Lomonosov), which made it possible to substantiate the analysis of opportunities and threats as the initial stage of strategizing the scientific and innovative activities of a regional university. The methods of OTSW-analysis, economic-statistical analysis, comparative analysis were used Analytical and forecast documents of authoritative Russian and international organizations dealing with the problems of science and higher education were used.results. 12 trends of various levels are identified that determine the opportunities and threats for the strategic development of scientific and innovative activities in the universities of the Kemerovo region - Kuzbass. At the global level, these include a decrease in demand for higher education and the need for scientific and innovative diversification; the growth of the global research and development market, especially in certain niches; growth in the share of research and development funding by commercial organizations; influence on the research topics of the international agenda, including the UN sustainable development goals. The main national trends are instability and limited funding for research and development, the growing interest of the state in fundamental research; maintaining a low level of integration of universities with business with the growth of the innovative activity of the latter; the growing stratification of the domestic higher education. In the Kemerovo region - Kuzbass, the most important trends are the structural transformation of the traditional university system with increased competition among universities; limited demand for research and development, not corresponding to the economic importance of the region; creation of institutional foundations for the development of scientific and innovative activities and the strategic goals of Kuzbass for scientific and technological development, which determine promising areas of research.Conclusions. Based on the analysis of strategically significant trends, the first stage of the OTSW analysis was implemented, the opportunities and threats that determine the strategic development of research activities of the universities of the Kemerovo region - Kuzbass were identified.Downloads
References
Бавыкина Е. Н., Фомина С. А., Корецкая Т. В. Маркетинговые стратегии на рынке образовательных услуг как основа стратегии устойчивого развития вуза // Экономика устойчивого развития. 2021. № 3. С. 20-24.
Горелова Г. Г., Шибанова Е. К., Степанов В. А. Концепция стратегии развития регионального вуза, основанная на запросах субъектов образовательного пространства // Среднерусский вестник общественных наук. 2015. Т. 10. № 5. С. 25-34.
Емельянова И. Н. Стратегические приоритеты классического университета: контент-анализ миссий // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2016. № 5. С. 4-14.
Ибрашева Б. С., Шарапова В. М. Анализ факторов для разработки стратегии вуза на основе SWOT-анализа // Образование и право. 2019. № 8. С. 258-263.
Квинт В. Л. Концепция стратегирования. Кемерово: Кемеровский государственный университет, 2020. 170 с.
Квинт В. Л. Разработка стратегии: мониторинг и прогнозирование внутренней и внешней среды // Управленческое консультирование. 2015. № 7. С. 6-11.
Квинт В. Л., Астапов К. Л. Стратегия Кузбасса на 50-летнюю перспективу в книгах Библиотеки "Стратегия Кузбасса" // Стратегирование: теория и практика. 2021. Т. 1. № 2. С. 123-135.
Квинт В. Л., Хворостяная А. С., Сасаев Н. И. Авангардные технологии в процессе стратегирования // Экономика и управление. 2020. Т. 26. № 11. С. 1170-1179.
Концептуальное будущее Кузбасса: стратегические контуры приоритетов развития до 2071 г. 50-летняя перспектива / под науч. ред. В. Л. Квинта. Кемерово: Кемеровский государственный университет, 2022. 283 с.
Корчагина И. В. Доходы опорных университетов России: динамика и тенденции // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2021. Т. 25. № 2. С. 141-157.
Кузнецов В. В., Лукина А. В., Малова Д. В. Принципы и механизмы стратегии устойчивого развития вуза // Вестник Российского государственного экономического университета им. Г. В. Плеханова. 2017. № 1. С. 56-64.
Матвеева Е. В. Построение коммуникативной стратегии вуза культуры на рынке образовательных услуг // Alma Mater (Вестник высшей школы). 2021. № 9. С. 48-54.
Томилин О. Б., Клюев А. К. "Черные лебеди" организационного дизайна российских университетов // Высшее образование в России. 2021. Т. 30. № 8-9. С. 44-55.
Трубилин А. И., Гайдук В. И., Кондрашова А. В. Стратегия развития аграрного вуза в постпандемический период // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. 2020. Т. 223. № 3. С. 329-338.
Тхапсагоев Х. Г. Университет: к стратегии движения "за горизонт" // Высшее образование в России. 2019. Т. 28. № 8-9. С. 83-90.
Aucejo E. M., French J., Ugalde Araya M. P., Zafar B. The impact of COVID-19 on student experiences and expectations: Evidence from a survey // Journal of Public Economics. 2020. Vol. 191. Art. 104271.
Davies S., Zarifa D. The stratification of universities: Structural inequality in Canada and the United States // Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. 2012. Vol. 30. N 2. P. 143-158.
Dorantes A. R., Low J. R. Financial crisis management in higher education: responses by 20 private colleges and universities to the 2007-2009 financial crisis // Journal of Education Finance. 2016. Vol. 42. N 2. P. 188-219.
Douglass J. A. Vibrant urban university with a growing global presence: thoughts on what Malmö University could be. Malmö: Malmö University, 2017. 56 p.
Ewing L. A. Rethinking higher education post COVID-19 // The Future of Service Post-COVID-19 Pandemic. 2021. Vol. 1. P. 37-54.
Glaze A. L. Teaching and learning science in the 21st century: challenging critical assumptions in post-secondary science // Education Sciences. 2018. Vol. 8. N 1. Art. 12.
Kromydas T. Rethinking higher education and its relationship with social inequalities: past knowledge, present state and future potential // Palgrave Communications. 2017. Vol. 3. Art. 1.
Musselin C. New forms of competition in higher education // Socio-Economic Review. 2018. Vol. 16. N 3. P. 657-683.
Odden T. O., Marin A., Rudolph J. L. How has Science Education changed over the last 100 years? An analysis using natural language processing // Science Education. 2021. Vol. 105. N 4. P. 653-680.
Osborne J. Science Education for the twenty first century // Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 2007. Vol. 3. N 3. P. 173-184.
Pavlov O. V., Katsamakas E. Will colleges survive the storm of declining enrollments? A computational model // PLoS ONE. 2020. Vol. 15. N 8. Art. e0236872.
