Current Trends in Project Management: Mixed Research of ‘Gymnastic' Enterprise Concept
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-7-115-127Keywords:
project management, project-based organization, gymnastic enterprise, organizational ambidexterity, content-analysis, mixed research, qualitative data analysis, hybrid methodology, contingency approachAbstract
Project management plays significant role in modern economy and public administration. Project management trends have a great impact on the performance of projects and enterprises, methods and tools of management, training programs for managers. The "Pulse of the Profession " survey, regularly published by the Project Management Institute, allows tracking current trends in project management practice. In 2021, the "Pulse of the Profession" was dedicated to a new concept - the "gymnastic" enterprise. In this article, the authors analyze the text of "Pulse of the Profession", 2021 using mixed research methods including qualitative and quantitative content analysis tools. The results show the closeness of the "gymnastic" enterprise concept to the concept of organizational ambidexterity. A content analysis helped to identify the key organizational practices of "gymnastic" enterprise, such as the situational use of hybrid project management methodologies and methodological pluralism, the combination of structural coherence and flexibility in project management processes, the active use of entrepreneurial and innovative methods and approaches, as well as tools and techniques for talent management, organizational change and learning. The indicated practices allow "gymnastic" enterprises to achieve better results in comparison with "traditional" companies. The results also indicate the ability of the "gymnastic" enterprise concept to influence project management practice, educational and training programs and consulting services in the field of project management.Downloads
References
Аштон А., Байер Ю. П. Управление или саморегулирование? Определение эффективного способа ведения бизнеса при продвижении счастья в современном мире: по результатам эмпирического исследования российских ИТ-компаниий // Управленческое консультирование. 2020. № 9. С. 126-144. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2020-9-126-144.
Волкова А. А., Плотников В. А., Рукинов М.В. Цифровая экономика: сущность явления, проблемы и риски формирования и развития // Управленческое консультирование. 2019. № 4. С. 38-49.
Лихтин А. А. Проблемное поле современного публичного управления: контент-анализ научных публикаций // Управленческое консультирование. 2021. № 5. С. 78-86. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2021-5-78-86.
Мирошников С. Н. Применение проектного подхода в рамках системы стратегического планирования регионального развития // Управленческое консультирование. 2019. № 11. С. 92-100. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2019-11-92-100
Очаковская В.А. Применение гибридных методов в управлении проектами // Проблемы современной экономики. 2020. С. 128-130.
Петров М. Н. Гибкие и экстремальные методы управления проектами, как новая парадигма проектного управления // Современная наука: актуальные проблемы теории и практики. Сер.: Экономика и право. 2017. № 4. С. 54-58.
Смирнов В. П., Шифрин М.Б. Внедрение проектно-ориентированного стиля управления в систему профессионального образования // Управленческое консультирование. 2021. № 3. С. 90-97. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2021-3-90-97.
Титов С. А. Исследование масштабов использования проектно-ориентированных форм организации хозяйственной деятельности в высокотехнологических секторах экономики // Cloud of Science. 2014. Т. 1. № 1. С. 155.
Чаплина А. Н., Максименко И. А. Новая управленческая парадигма обеспечения баланса между исследованиями и эксплуатацией в целях достижения конкурентной устойчивости // Проблемы современной экономики. 2021. №. 2. С. 64-68.
Яновский В.В., Исаев А. П., Нещерет А. К. О реализации проектного подхода в государственном управлении и местном самоуправлении // Управленческое консультирование. 2018. № 1 (7). С. 8-16. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2018-7-8-16.
Bazeley P. ‘Mixed methods in management research: Implications for the field' // Electronic Journal of Business research Methods. 2015. N 13 (1). P. 27-35.
Bredillet C. From the editor. Exploring research in project management: Nine schools of project management research (p. 2) // Journal of Project Management. 2007. N 38 (3). Vol. 3-5. P. 26-34.
Gedzun W. The entrepreneurial project manager // ProjectManagement.com. 2016. URL: https://www.projectmanagement.com/contentPages/article.cfm?ID=344389&thisPageURL=/articles/344389/The-Entrepreneurial-Project-Manager_=_ (дата обращения: 03.10.2021).
Gilb T. Evolutionary project management: Multiple performance, quality and cost metrics for early and continuous stakeholder value delivery. In Enterprise Information Systems VI. Springer, Dordrecht. 2006. P. 24-29.
Kuckartz U., Rädiker S. Using MAXQDA for Mixed Methods Research. The Routledge Reviewer's Guide to Mixed Methods Analysis, 2021. 305 p.
Laloux F. The future of management is teal // Strategy + business. 2015. N 80. P. 1-12.
Lumpkin G. T., Dess G. G. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance // Academy of management Review. 1996. N 21 (1). P. 135-172.
O Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. The ambidextrous organization // Harvard business review. 2004. N 82 (4). P. 74-83.
O'Connor G. C., DeMartino R. Organizing for radical innovation: An exploratory study of the structural aspects of RI management systems in large established firms // Journal of product innovation management. 2006. N 23 (6). P. 475-497.
Ojiako U. et al. The impact of project portfolio management practices on the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and project performance success // Production Planning & Control. 2021. P. 1-15.
Padalkar M., Gopinath S. Six decades of project management research: Thematic trends and future opportunities // International Journal of Project Management. 2016. N 34 (7). P. 1305-1321.
PMI. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). 7th ed. Newtown Square, PA. 2021.
PMI. Pulse of the Profession: Driving Success in Challenging Times. 2012. Newtown Square, PA. URL: https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/pulse-of-the-profession-american-english-2012.pdf?v=52c063b2-6a10-4a50-92fe-e23a11166d95&sc_lang_temp=en (дата обращения: 03.11.2021).
PMI. Pulse of the Profession: The High Cost of Low Performance. 2013. Newtown Square, PA. URL: https://www.pmi.org/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/the-high-cost-of-low-performance-2013 (дата обращения: 03.11.2021).
PMI. Project Management circa 2025. Edited by David I. Cleland, Bopaya Bidanda. Project management institute Inc. 2009. Newtown Square, PA.
PMI. Pulse of the Profession: Success in Disruptive Times. 2018. Newtown Square, PA. URL: https://www.pmi.org/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/pulse-of-the-profession-2018 (дата обращения: 03.11.2021).
PMI. Pulse of the Profession: The Future of Work. 2019. Newtown Square, PA. URL: https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/pulse-of-the-profession-2019.pdf?v=ff445571-0b23-4a2b-a989-44eb20df55bd&sc_lang_temp=en (дата обращения: 03.11.2021).
PMI. Pulse of the Profession: Beyond Agility. 2021. Newtown Square, PA. URL: https://www.pmi.org/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/pulse-of-the-profession-2021 (дата обращения: 03.11.2021).
Sender S. W. Systematic agreement: A theory of organizational alignment // Human Resource Development Quarterly. 1997. N 8 (1). P. 23-40.
Smith A. C., Sutherland F., Gilbert D. H. Reinventing innovation: Designing the dual organization. Springer. 2017. 432 p.
Tushman M. L., O'Reilly III C. A. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change // California management review.1996. N 38 (4). P. 8-29.
Weber Y., Tarba S. Y. Strategic agility: A state of the art introduction to the special section on strategic agility // California Management Review. 2014. N 56 (3) P. 5-12.
