Influence of Various Forms of Education on the State of Human Capital as a Factor of Production in the Regions of Russia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-7-137-149Keywords:
human capital, university rankings, gross regional product, education, factor of productionAbstract
The study aims to identify the role of university and professional education in the formation of human capital, which is embodied in different rates of economic development at the regional level in the Russian Federation. With the method of regression analysis we compare the level of education of the population with the rating of universities located in the constituent entity of the Russian Federation. Using the methods of endogenous growth theories, the contribution of human capital to the interregional difference in gross regional product per capita was estimated. The absence of a relationship was found between the dependent variable (gross regional product per capita) and the independent variables (education index, the number of universities in the list of the best universities). When comparing two regions of the Russian Federation, in which the discrepancy between the rating of universities and the level of education was most obvious, it was found that the difference in gross regional product per capita is completely determined by the state of human capital. This distinguishes subnational comparisons from cross-country comparisons, where physical capital and related to technologies residuals play a role. Among the considered indicators of higher, professional education, postgraduate and doctoral studies, the relative level of professional education seems to be most significantly affect at the growth of the region's well-being, expressed in gross regional product per capita.Downloads
References
Благотворительный фонд Владимира Потанина. Рейтинг вузов. URL: https://www.fondpotanin.ru/activity/reyting-vuzov/?show_more=Y (дата обращения: 03.04.2022).
Добрынин А. И., Дятлов С. А., Цыренова Е. Д. Человеческий капитал в транзитивной экономике. СПб.: Наука. 1999. 309 с.
Доклад о развитии человека за 1996 год. ПРООН. Нью-Йорк: Оксфорд юниверсити пресс. 1996.
Доклад о человеческом развитии в Российской Федерации за 2014 год / под ред. Л. М. Григорьева, С. Н. Бобылева. М.: Аналитический центр при Правительстве Российской Федерации, 2014. 204 с.. URL: https://ac.gov.ru/files/publication/a/4758.pdf (дата обращения: 27.10.2021).
Кендрик Дж. Экономический рост и формирование капитала // Вопросы экономики. 1976. № 11. С. 141-154.
Регионы России. Социально-экономические показатели - 2020. URL: https://gks.ru/bgd/regl/b20_14p/Main.htm (дата обращения: 27.10.2021).
Ромер Д. Высшая макроэкономика. М.: Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики. 2014. 855 с.
Шабашев В. А., Шорохов С. И. Влияние человеческого капитала на экономический рост в регионах с различной производственной структурой. Кемерово: АИ «Кузбассвузиздат», 2015. 203 с.
Hall R., Jones C. Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others? // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1999. 114 (February). Р. 83-116.
Hendricks L. How Important Is Human Capital for Development? Evidence from Immigrant Earnings // American Economic Review. 2002. 92 (March). P. 198-219.
International Group of rating agencies. Рейтинг вузов по естественно-математическому и инженерно-техническому направлениям. URL: https://raex-a.ru/rankings/natural-mathematical-and-engineering-technical1 (дата обращения: 27.10.2021).
Klenow P., Rodr'ıguez-Clare A. The Neoclassical Revival in Growth Economics: Has It Gone Too Far? // NBER Macroeconomics Annual. 1997. N 12. P. 73-103.
Mincer J. Schooling, Experience and Earnings // National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. 1974.
Schultz Th. W. Investment in Human Capital. N. Y., London, 1971.