Экосистемный подход к сбалансированному территориальному развитию

Л.А. Гамидуллаева; Е.С. Грошева

doi:10.22394/1726-1139-2024-1-144-162

Authors

L.A. Gamidullaeva Penza State University Автор https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3042-7550 (unauthenticated)
E.S. Grosheva K. G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of technologies and management (the First Cossack University) Автор https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6066-1001 (unauthenticated)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-1-144-162

Keywords:

sustainable development, rural areas, small territories, spatial regional policy, strategy, territorial development, rural ecosystem, cluster

Abstract

Relevance. The problems of sustainable development of rural areas are extremely relevant nowadays, especially in the context of deepening localization and the increasing role of territorial and natural resources. research objective. The purpose of the article is to develop theoretical and methodological aspects of sustainable development of territories, encompassing rural areas with small urban settlements, based on the ecosystem approach to form a unified multi-level strategy for the development thereof. Method and data. The paper substantiates an application of the ecosystem approach to the development of rural areas in increasing the efficiency of rural businesses, budgetary spending through prioritization of state support recipients, stimulating sustainable development of enterprises and the industry, and increasing the consistency of regional economic policy. The conceptual foundations of this approach are presented, and an algorithm to select participants in a rural ecosystem is proposed. results. The proposed approach allows operationalizing self-organization processes in an ecosystem, ensuring a balance of interaction processes of its participants. The research results have contributed to solving the problem of territorial socio-economic ecosystem formation by proposing an algorithm to select target indicators for achieving sustainable development goals, taking into account the specifics and development trends of territories. Conclusions. The conclusions arising from the conducted research provide scientists, government bodies with the necessary information for a better understanding of practical mechanisms to provide balanced territorial development, ensure the move from fragmentary unsystematic measures of state support to effective differentiated and targeted regional policy of rural areas.

Agencies

This study was supported by the grant of the President of the Russian Federation for the young Russian scientists’ state support on scientific research “Balanced development of the territory based on industrial clusters in the context of theory of “smart specialization”” (grant number: MD-1823.2022.2).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

L.A. Gamidullaeva, Penza State University

Leyla A. Gamidullaeva, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of Department of management and public administration
E.S. Grosheva, K. G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of technologies and management (the First Cossack University)

Ekaterina S. Grosheva, Senior Lecturer, Department of Management and Business Informatics, Researcher, Penza Cossack Institute of Technology (branch)

References

Alekseev A., Safronov S., Savoskul M., Kuznecova G. The main trends in the evolution of rural settlement in Russia in the XX — early XXI centuries. ECO. 2019. N 49 (4). P. 26–49. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2019-4-26-49 (in Rus.).

Glazovsky N., Gordeev A., Sdasyuk G. Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development: World Experience and Problems of Russia. M. : KMK Scientific Press, 2005. 614 p. (in Rus.).

Ikonnikova О. Basic approaches to the notion of “sustainable development of rural territories” // Problems of Modern Economics. 2012. N 1 (41). P. 349–352 (in Rus.).

Kiryushin V. Consequences of Radical Economic Liberalism and the Tasks of the New Agrarian Policy // Innovationsю 2015. N 1. P. 14–27 (in Rus.).

Oborin M., Chernikova S. The impact of agriculture on socio-economic development of the region // Transbaikal State University Journal. 2018. N 24 (8). P. 137‒146. DOI: 10.21209/222792452018248137146 (in Rus.).

Repina А., Zaitsev D., Kornilov D. Problems of development of rural areas and solutions // Aeconomics: Economics and Agriculture. 2014. N 3 (3). P. 4–9 (in Rus.).

Tikhii V., Koreva O. (2019). The sustainable development of rural territories of the region through the formation of regional agro-industrial cluster InterCarto. InterGIS. GI support of sustainable development of territories // Proceedings of the International conference. M. : Moscow University Press. V. 25. P. 1. P. 206–218. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2019-1-25-206-218 (in Rus.).

Ushachev I. at al. Development of agriculture of Russia and increasing its competitiveness under the conditions of integration in the EAEU. M. : Rosinformagrotekh, 2018. ISBN 978-5-7367-1469-8 (in Rus.).

Ushachev I. at al. Strategic directions for the development of agriculture in Russia in the context of deepening integration into the EAEU. M. : RAS. ISBN 978-5-906906-86-1 (in Rus.).

Adner R., Kapoor R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations // Strategic Management Journal. 2010. N 31 (3). P. 306–333. DOI: 10.1002/smj.821.

Alvedalen J., Boschma R. A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda // European Planning Studies. 2017. Vol. 25. N 6. P. 887–903. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694.

Barreiro-Gen M. Discussing Approaches to Standard of Living. Cham : Springer, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_22-1.

Blew R. On the definition of ecosystem // Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America. 1996. N 77. P. 171–173.

Carolina Wijayanti F., Veronica V., Biri A. The important role of coffee agroecosystem for rural development // IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. 2019. Sci., 374 012025. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/374/1/012025.

Chertow M., Portlock M. Developing Industrial Ecosystems: Approaches, Cases, and Tools // Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Bulletin Series. 2002. N 95. 16. Cotter D. Poor people in poor places: Local opportunity structures and household poverty // Rural Sociology. 2002. N 67 (4). DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2002.tb00118.x.

Da Rosa Pires A., Pertoldi M., Edwards J., Hegyi F. Smart Specialisation and Innovation in Rural Areas // S3 Policy Brief Series. 09/2014. DOI: 10.2791/312469

Fisher M. On the Empirical Finding of a Higher Risk of Poverty in Rural Areas: Is Rural Residence Endogenous to Poverty? // Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2005. N 30 (2). P. 185–199. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31219.

Gamidullaeva L, Shmeleva N, Tolstykh T., Shmatko A. An Assessment Approach to Circular Business Models within an Industrial Ecosystem for Sustainable Territorial Development // Sustainability. 2022. N 14 (2). P. 704. DOI: 10.3390/su14020704.

Gamidullaeva L., Korostyshevskaya E. Prospective Models for Sustainable Development of Territorial Socio-Economic Systems // Sustainable development of territorial socio-economic systems: research perspectives and empirical evidence. Springer Nature. 2023 (in Press).

Gamidullaeva L., Tolstykh T., Bystrov A., Radaykin A., Shmeleva N. Cross-Sectoral Digital Platform as a Tool for Innovation Ecosystem Development // Sustainability. 2021. N 13. P. 11686. DOI: 10.3390/su132111686.

Gray D., Shaw J., Farrington J. Community transport, social capital and social exclusion in rural areas // Area. 2006. N 38. P. 89–98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00662.x.

Gumerov R. State program for the development of agriculture: Ambitions and realities // ECO. 2019. N 49 (4). P. 8–25. DOI: 10.30680/ЕСО0131–7652–2019–4–8–25.

Hughes T. P. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880–1930. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983.

Lichter D., Johnson K. The changing spatial concentration of America’s rural poor population // Rural Sociology. 2007. N 72 (3). P. 331–358. DOI: 10.1526/003601107781799290.

Martinidis G., Adamseged M., Dyjakon A., Fallas Y. at al. How Clusters Create Shared Value in Rural Areas: An Examination of Six Case Studies // Sustainability 2021. N 13. P. 4578. DOI: 10.3390/su13084578.

Medeiros E. Development Clusters for Small Places and Rural Development for Territorial Cohesion? // Sustainability. 2022. N 14 (1). P. 84. DOI: 10.3390/su14010084.

Michalek J., Ciaian P., Di Marcantonio F. Regional impacts of the EU Rural Development Programme: Poland’s food processing sector // Reg. Stud. 2022. N 54. P. 1389–1401. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1708306.

Murphy D., Marshall A. Citizenship and Sustainability in Organizations: Exploring and Spanning the Boundaries (1st ed.). Routledge, 2020. 178 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780429347399.

Pelucha M., Kveton V. The role of EU rural development policy in the neo-productivist agricultural paradigm // Reg. Stud. 2017. N 51. P. 1860–1870. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1282608.

Pollermann K., Raue P., Schnaut G. Opportunities for a participative approach in rural development // Findings from LEADER in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and the requirements for Community Led Local Development Landbauforsch, Landbauforschung Volkenrode. 2014. N 64. P. 127–138. DOI: 10.3220/LBF_2014_127-138.

Rizov M. Rural development under the European CAP: The role of diversity // Soc. Sci. J. 2005. N 42. P. 621–628. DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2005.09.003.

Rosenberg N. On Technological Expectations // The Economic Journal. 1976. N 86 (343). P. 523–535.

Shmeleva N., Gamidullaeva L., Tolstykh T., Lazarenko D. Challenges and Opportunities for Technology Transfer Networks in the Context of Open Innovation: Russian Experience // J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021. N 7. P. 197. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc7030197.

Shucksmith M, Cameron S., Merridew T., Pichler F. Urban-Rural Differences in Quality of Life across the European Union // Regional Studies. 2009. N 43 (10). P. 1275–1289. DOI: 10.1080/00343400802378750.

Teece D. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance // Strategic Management Journal. 2007. N 28 (13). P. 1319–1350. DOI: 10.1002/smj.640.

Theodorakopoulos N., Sánchez P., Bennett D. Transferring technology from university to rural industry within a developing economy context: the case for nurturing communities of practice // Technovation 2012. N 32 (9–10). P. 550–559. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.05.001.

Tolstykh T., Gamidullaeva L., Shmeleva N. Universities as Knowledge Integrators and Cross-Industry Ecosystems: Self-Organizational Perspective // SAGE Open. 2021. N 11 (1). DOI: 10.1177/2158244020988704.

Tolstykh T., Shmeleva N., Gamidullaeva L. Evaluation of Circular and Integration Potentials of Innovation Ecosystems for Industrial Sustainability // Sustainability. 2020. N 12 (11). P. 4574. DOI: 10.3390/su12114574.

Trabskaja J., Mets T. Ecosystem as the Source of Entrepreneurial Opportunities // Foresight and STI Governance. 2019. N 13 (4). P. 10–22. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.4.10.22.

Ushachev I. Agrarian policy of Russia: Problems and solutions. M. : V. V. Nasirddinov Publishing House, 2016. ISBN 978-5-905523-26-7.

Weber B., Jensen L., Miller K., Mosley J., Fisher M. A critical review of rural poverty literature: Is there truly a rural effect? // International Regional Science Review. 2005. N 28 (4). P. 381–414. DOI: 10.1177%2F0160017605278996.

Zemtsov S., Baburin V. Entrepreneurial ecosystems in the regions of Russia // Regional Studies. 2019. N 2. P. 4–14. DOI: 10.5922.1994-5280-2019-2-1.

An Ecosystem Approach to Balanced Territorial Development

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

Agencies

Downloads

Author Biographies

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License

How to Cite

Коды статьи

Language