Legal Protection of the Artistic Merit in the Producer Contract

Authors

  • Viktor Petrovich Kirilenko Северо-Западный институт управления - филиал РАНХиГС , North-West Institute of Management - branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Автор
  • Georgy Valeryevich Alekseev Северо-Западный институт управления - филиал РАНХиГС , North-West Institute of Management - branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Автор

Keywords:

media law, Producer contract, artistic merit, freedom of expression, virtual reality

Abstract

Artistic merit and aesthetic value of the art works is stated and discussed in the producer contract while the art work itself does not exist on this stage of legal interaction. To some extent the artistic merit is the issue of aesthetics, but as the price of contract depends on quality and future usage, the artistic merit acquire its judicial meaning on the stage of accepting the art work by the producer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Абрамова Е. Н. Гражданское право: учебник / Абрамова Е. Н., Аверченко Н. Н., Байгушева Ю. В. В 3 т. Т. 3. М.: Велби, 2010. 800 с.

Бачило И. Л. Информационное право / Бачило И. Л., Федотов М. А., Лопатин В. Н. СПб.: Юридический центр Пресс, 2001. 789 c.

Бентли Л., Шерман Б. Право интеллектуальной собственности: авторское право. СПб.: Юридический центр Пресс, 2004. 535 с.

Гражданское право: учебник / под ред. Е. А. Суханова: В 2 т. Т. 2. М.: БЕК, 1994. 816 c.

Дозорцев В. А. Авторские дела в суде: Научно-практический комментарий. М., 1985. 175 c.

Кириленко В. П., Алексеев Г. В. Международно-правовые гарантии свободы самовыражения // Управленческое консультирование. 2014. № 2. С. 116-124.

Попов В. А. О понятии и признаках объекта авторского права // Проблемы советского авторского права. М.: ВААП, 1979. 209 с.

Сергеев А. П. Право интеллектуальной собственности в Российской Федерации. М.: Проспект. 2004. 752 с.

Boyle J. The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. Yale University Press, 2008. 315 p.

Johns A. Piracy: Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg to Gates. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009. 640 p.

Lastowka Greg. Virtual Justice: The New Laws of Online Worlds. Yаlе University Press, 2011. 241 p.

Madison M. J. Fair use and social practice // Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Copyright and related rights. Peter K Yu. Praedger. West Port. 2007. P. 178-179.

Mayer-Schönberger V. Virtual Heisenberg: The Limits of Virtual World Regulability // Washington & Lee Law Review. 2009. № 66(3). P. 1245-1264.

Mayer-Schönberger V., Cukier K. Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform how We Live, Work, and Think. Houghton Miffli n Harcourt, 2013. 242p.

Neilson J. A. Artistic Expression, Aesthetic Value and the Law. The University of Texas at Austin, 2011. 215 p.

Raz J. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986. 448 p.

Schauer F. F. The Law of Obscenity. Washington, D. C.: Bureau of National Affairs, 1976. 459 p.

Stokes S. Art and copyright. Hart Publishing, 2001. 306 р.

Todd D. Pirate Nation: How Digital Piracy is Transforming Business Society and Culture. N. Y.: Kogan Page Ltd, 2011. 240 р.

Ulmer E. Urheber und Verlagsrecht. 3rd edn. Berlin: Springer, 1980, P. 133-139.

Van Eechoud М. М. [etc.]. Harmonizing European Copyright Law: The Challenges of Better Lawmaking, Information Law Series. Vol. 19(Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009). P. 41.

Van Gompel S., Lavik E. Quality, merit, aesthetics and purpose: An inquiry into EU copyright law's eschewal of other criteria than originality // Revue Internationale du Droit d'Auteur. № 236 (April 2013). P. 100-295.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-15

Issue

No. 9 (2014)

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kirilenko V.P., Alekseev G.V. Legal Protection of the Artistic Merit in the Producer Contract // Administrative Consulting. 2014. no. 9. P. 15–23.