The Analysis of the Factors Which Influence on the Subnational Units of Different Countries Participation in the Foreign Economic Relations

Authors

  • Elena Vasilyevna Zhiryaeva Северо-Западный институт управления - филиал РАНХиГС , North-West Institute of Management - branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Автор

Keywords:

substate diplomacy, foreign economic cooperation, external relations of regions, paradiplomacy, constituent diplomacy, subnational diplomacy

Abstract

Distinctive features of subnational territories of different countries groups in the foreign economic relations are enlightened in the article. Global factors such as internationalization and markets liberalization affect everywhere. It is established that the economic crisis acts as the incentive for the external relations development in developing country because at that moment foreign trade substitutes losses in domestic market. At the periods of stable economical development there are the border territories who feel a need for external relations. Other homogeneous communities of the developing state have no certain criterion at the contractor’s choice, they follow the general political policy of the country, but the existence of just a political motivation leads to the unreasonable growth of declarative formal agreements. The slowing down process of developing countries subnational units inclusion in foreign economic relations can be explained by the insufficient enterprise activity as a main reason. Initiative like this can be generated by the regional authority if it has an attraction point in the outside world thanks to the expressed cultural and political identity. Communications of the region with special identity, even when they arise in developing country, have content and involve notable economic benefits. As far as regions usually act in the spheres of foreign investments attraction and export of small and mediumsized enterprises support, it doesn’t creates conflict with the international obligations of the nation in the peaceful world situation. This analysis is presented in comparison with a situation in the developed countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Арканников А. А. Сотрудничество регионов РФ с Латинской Америкой: Волгоград - Венесуэла // Латинская Америка. 2011. № 12. C. 35-47.

Денека И. М. Канадский федерализм в контексте взаимоотношений федерального центра и провинций: автореф. дис. канд. юрид. наук. М., 2004. С. 12.

Дубинина О. Ю. Влияние регионализации на международные связи регионов Российской Федерации (1991-2007 гг.): автореф. дис. канд. полит. наук. М., 2007.

Елькин И. В. Оценка и перспективы развития экономики региона с экспортной ориентацией: автореф. дис. канд. экон. наук. М., 2010.

Жиряева Е. В. The characteristic of foreign trade policy tools for subnational units // Научно-технические ведомости СПбГПУ. 2014. Т. 5. № 204. С. 48-56.

Жиряева Е. В. Роль международных связей в экономике регионов России: монография. СПб.: Изд-во СЗИУ РАНХиГС, 2012.

Мартин Б. Конституцiйнi основи законодавчоi дiяльностi латиноамериканських федерацiй (Аргентiни, Бразiлii, Венесуели i Мексiки): автореф. дис. канд. юрид. наук. Киев, 1995. С. 11.

Мелкумов А. А. Канадский федерализм: теория и практика. М.: Экономика. 1998.

Степурина А. Н. Влияние глобализации на развитие международных связей регионов федеративных государств (на примере РФ, ФРГ и США): автореф. дис. канд. полит. наук. М., 2009.

Яковлева Н. В., Левкин И. М. Особенности трансграничного субнационального сотрудничества в форме парадипломатии // Управленческое консультирование. 2014. № 4 (64). С. 14-22.

Bernier L. The Foreign Economic Policy of a Subnational State: the Case of Quebec. New Yorkи: Greenwood Press, 1988.

Cohn Th.H., Smith P. J. Subnational governments as international actors: constituent diplomacy in British Columbia and the Pacific Northwest // BC Studies. 1996. N 110. P. 25-59.

Hocking B. Regional government and international affairs: foreign policy problem or deviant behavior // International Journal. 1986. VXLI. N 3. P. 477-506.

Jimenez E. M. Glocalization: New Theoretical Approaches to Regional (Subnational) Development in the Context of Economic Integration and Globalization // Integration and trade. 2002. N 16. P. 199-231.

Kincaid J. Comparative observations on the international activities of constituent governments // Foreign policy of constituents units at the beginning of 21st century. Barcelona: Collecció Institut d'Estudis Autonòmics, 2010. P. 15-28.

Kline J. A new federalism for United States foreign policy // Intenational Journal. 1986. Vol. 41. N 3. P. 507-538.

Panizza U. On the Determinants of Fiscal Centralization: Theory or Evidence // Journal of Public Economics. 1999. Vol. 74. N 1. P. 97-139.

Requejo F. Foreign policy of constituents units in a globalised world // Foreign policy of constituents units at the beginning of 21st century. Barcelona: Collecció Institut d'Estudis Autonòmics, 2010. P. 11-14.

Sharafutdinova G. Paradiplomacy in the Russian Region. Tatarstan's Search for Statehood // Europe-Asia Studies. 2003. Vol. 55. N 4. P. 613-629.

Skoutaris N. Comparing the Subnational Constitutional Space of the European Sub-State Entities in the Area of Foreign Affairs // Perspectives on Federalism. 2012. Vol. 4. P. E-239-E-268.

Soldatos P. An Explanatory framework for the study of federated states as foreign-policy actors // Michelmann H, Soldatos P. Federalism and International Relations: the role of subnational units. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhiryaeva E.V. The Analysis of the Factors Which Influence on the Subnational Units of Different Countries Participation in the Foreign Economic Relations // Administrative Consulting. 2016. no. 4. P. 125–135.