Global and Glocal Trade Streams Assessment in the Subjects of the Northwestern Federal District Trade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-5-113-129Keywords:
gravitation equation, globalization, glocalization, foreign trade, export, border regions, territorial subjects of the Russian Federation, northwestern federal districtAbstract
The relevance of the article is connected with the fact that the phenomenon of globalization and the related process of a glocalisation needs a quantitative assessment. The purpose is to establish the factors having universal meaning for the export of all subjects of the Northwestern Federal District and factors having special meaning for some of them. Secondly, our purpose was to define a weight of these special (glocal) variables in comparison to global. The gravitation equation characterizing the main regularities of export of the Northwestern Federal District subjects is received. The quality of the model for forecasting is sufficient. The simplified gravitation equation in a multiplicative form is offered. Model lets to establish export of the subject of the Northwestern Federal District connection with variables of glocality (existence of the common sea and belonging of the country of import to the European continent). Existence of the common overland borders doesn't play an essential role. The share of the glocal factors defining the streams of foreign trade makes 11%. The signs which distinguish trade of border subjects are: the volume of trade is higher than an average; in each bilateral direction goods of three or more Harmonized System chapters are shipped. Export dependence on global characteristics such as the level of regional economic integration of the country and the Liner Shipping Connectivity Index for St. Petersburg is more significant than for the Northwestern Federal District in general. The practical value of work consists in the fact that it confirms importance of the European countries as trade partners for subjects of the Northwestern Federal District.Downloads
References
Бабецкая-Кухарчук О., Морель М. Переход к рынку в России и его влияние на международную интеграцию: препринт. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2003.
Грицаенко Е. А. Внешнеторговые связи России в региональном развитии: автореф. дис.. д-ра геогр. наук. М.: Ин-т географии РАН. 2006. 44 с.
Гусейн-Заде С. М., Михеева В. С., Ханин С. Е. Моделирование территориальных социально-экономических систем // Вестник Московского университета. (Серия 5. География). 1988. № 3. С. 14-20.
Жиряева Е. В., Дариева Ю. Ц., Банзаров Д. Ц. Анализ особенностей внешней торговли приграничных субъектов России // Управленческое консультирование. 2013. № 7. С. 6673.
Земцов С. П., Бабурин В. Л. Оценка потенциала экономико-географического положения регионов России // Экономика региона. 2016. Т. 12. Вып. 1. С. 117-138.
Кабаков Р. R в действии. Анализ и визуализация данных в программе R. М.: ДМК Пресс, 2016.
Каукин А. С., Идрисов Г. И. Гравитационная модель внешней торговли России. Случай большой по площади страны с протяженной границей // Экономическая политика. 2013. № 4. С. 133-154.
Макарычев А. С. Глобальное и локальное: меняющаяся роль государства в управлении пространственным развитием // Политическая наука. 2003. № 3. С. 8-27.
Региональное развитие: опыт России и Европейского Союза / отв. ред. А.Г. Гранберг. М.: Экономика. 2000.
Тишутина О. И. Методология и стратегия обеспечения устойчивости доходной базы бюджетов приграничных субъектов Российской Федерации: автореф. дисс. д-ра экон. наук. Саратов. 2008.
Хелпман Э. Понимание мировой торговли. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара. 2017.
A practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis. UNCTAD. 2012 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https:// www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/wto_unctad12_e.pdf (дата обращения: 20.04.2018).
Anderson J. E., Wincoop E. Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle // American Economic Review. 2003. 93. P. 170-192.
Bauman Z. Glokalizacja, czyli komu globalizacja, a komu lokalizacja // Studiasgcjologiczne. W-wa. 1997. N 3. S. 53-69.
Blatter J. Glocalization // Encyclopedia Britannica. [Электронный ресурс]: https://www. britannica.com/topic/glocalization (дата обращения: 20.04.2018).
Elizondo P. L., Krugman P. Trade Policy and Third World Metropolis // Journal of Development Economics. 1996. Vol. 4. P. 137-150.
Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A. J. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. The MIT Press. Cambridge. Massachusetts. 1999.
Harris C. D. The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States // Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1954. 44. N 4. P. 315-348.
Hettne B. Globalization and the New Regionalism. L. 1999. P. 7-8.
Hoover E., Eloranta E., Holmstrom J. Managing the Demand-Supply Chain. John Wiley & sons, Inc. 2001.
House J. W. Frontier on the Rio Grande: A Political Geogrpahy of Development and Social Deprivation. Oxford, 1982.
Jonsson C., Tagi S., Tornqvist G. Organizing European space. L., Thousand Oaks. New Delhi. 2000. P. 156.
Krugman P. What's New about the New Economic Geography? // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 1998. Vol. 14. N 2.
Liner Shipping Connectivity Index. 2017. UNCTAD. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://unctad. org/en/Pages/DTL/TTL/Infrastructure-and-Services.aspx
Losch A. Die raumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft, 2 Auflage. 1944.
Martin P., Ottaviano G. M. Growing Locations: Industry location in a model of endogenous growth // European Economic Review. 1999. Vol. 43. P. 281-302.
McCallum J. National borders matter: Canada-US. Regional trade patterns // The American Economic Review. Vol. 85. N 3. 1995. P. 615-623.
Niebuhr A., Stiller S. Integration effect in border region - a survey of economic theory and empirical studies // HWWA discussion paper. Hamburg Institute of International Economics. 2002. N 179.
Ohlin B. Interregional and International Trade. 3rd edition. Harvard University Press. Cambridge. Massachusetts. 1967.
Ohmae K. The end of the national state: The rise of regional economies L.: Harper Collins.1995. X.
Rauch J. E. Comparative Advantage, Geographic Advantage and the Volume of Trade // The Economic Journal. 1991. Vol. 101. P. 1230-1244.
Robertson R. Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity / Eds. M. Featherstone, S. Lash, R. Robertson // Global Modernities. L.: 1995.
Tinbergen J. Shaping the world economy [Text] (New York: Twentieth Century Fund) 1962.
