Modern Democracy and Political Leaders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-7-17-31Keywords:
позиционная легитимация, democracy, quantum politics, decoherence, globalization, mondialisation, political waves, positional legitimationAbstract
The subject of the presented research is the transformation of political leader’s authority inside the global network society in modern democracy. Scientifi works and studies based on introduction of some analogies from quantum physics into political science are overviewed in the article. The main purpose of such analogies is to improve the quality of political processes analysis and policy predictions. The term “quantum democracy” is used by the authors in relation to the crisis of democracy, noting the high degree of elitism of modern politics. The waves of globalization are destroying traditional social and political institutions faster than new power structures responsible for an effective policy decisions formed in specifi countries. Democratic leadership develops in accordance with global trends, creating a new type of economically legitimate positional dominance, developing “legitimate naming” in the modern world. Political leaders under modern democracy retained the ability to bring their decisions in life to the extent that these decisions meet the condition of the national political fi Limitation of the political leader’s authority by the laws of quantum processes put legitimacy depending on those positions that are poles of the politicalDownloads
References
Буравой М. Что делать? Тезисы о деградации социального бытия в глобализирующемся мире // Социологические исследования. 2009. № 4. С. 3-8.
Грачев М. Н., Мадатов А. С. Демократия: методология исследования, анализ перспектив. М.: Алкигамма, 2004.
Гуревич П. С. Единство по кванту, а не по крови // Психология и Психотехника. 2015. № 5. С. 445-448.
Зорин В. А. Модели политического лидерства российских президентов // Полис. Политические исследования. 2010. № 4. С. 77-89.
Кириленко В. П. Алексеев Г. В. Международное право и информационная безопасность государств: монография. СПб.: СПбГИКиТ. 2016.
Круглый стол журнала «Полис». Шестопал Е. Б., Уинтер Д. Г., Ирхин Ю. В. и др. Политическое лидерство и проблемы личности // Полис. Политические исследования. 2011. № 2. С. 53- 68.
Мень М. А. Лидерство как социальный и личностный феномен (теоретико-методологические аспекты исследования). М.: Изд-во МГУ, 2011.
Мень М. А. Лидерство: личностно-интерактивный подход // Управленческое консультирование. 2011. № 4 (44). С. 92-105.
Морозов Г. Н., Алексеев Г. В. Недреманное око // Свободная мысль. 2013. № 2 (1638). С. 211-214.
Пантин В. И., Лапкин В. В. Волны политической модернизации в истории России к обсуждению гипотезы // Полис. Политические исследования. 1998. № 2. С. 39-51.
Стрельцов Д. В., Чугров С. В., Симо-Томаи Н., Леонтьева Е. Л. Мир. Вызовы глобального кризиса. Япония // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2013. № 9. С. 76- 91.
Тощенко Ж. Т. Фантомы российского общества. М.: Центр социального прогнозирования и маркетинга. 2015.
Тощенко Ж. Т. Травма общества: между эволюцией и революцией (приглашение к дискуссии) // Полис. Политические исследования. 2017. № 1. С. 70-84.
Человеческий капитал российских политических элит: политико-психологический анализ / под ред. Е. Б. Шестопал, А. В. Селезневой. М.: РОССПЭН, 2012.
Чугров С. В. Post-truth: трансформация политической реальности или саморазрушение либеральной демократии? // Полис. Политические исследования. 2017. № 2. С. 42-59.
Шапиро И. Переосмысливая теорию демократии в свете современной политики // Полис. Политические исследования. 2001. № 4. С. 27.
Шестопал Е. Б. Политическое лидерство в новых условиях: смена парадигмы восприятия // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2013. № 3 (115). С. 82-90.
Шестопал Е. Б. Введение в рубрику. Человеческое измерение политики // Полис. Политические исследования. 2013. № 6. С. 6-8.
Aerts D. Towards a New Democracy: Consensus through Quantum Parliament. In D. Aerts, B. D’Hooghe and N. Note (eds.), Worldviews, Science and Us, Redemarcating Knowledge and its Social and Ethical Implications. Singapore: World Scientific, 2005. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1142/9789812702043_0011.
Akrivoulis D. E. The Quantum Politics Metaphor in International Relations: Revising American Newtonianism. University of Kent at Canterbury. 2002.
Akrivoulis D. E. The Ways of Stargazing: methodological reflections American Newtonian metaphoricity; in T. Carver and J. Pikalo (eds) Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world. London: Routledge. 2008. P. 15-27.
Attali J. Millennium: winners and losers in the coming world order. New York: Random House. 1991.
Becker T. L. Quantum Politics: Applying Quantum Theory to Political Phenomena. Praeger Publishers. 1991.
Beerbohm E. Is Democratic Leadership Possible? // American Political Science Review. 2015. Vol. 109, N 4. P. 639-652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055415000398.
Bourdieu P. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge. 1984.
Bourdieu P. The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups // Theory and Society, 1985. 14 (6). Vol. 14, N 6. P. 723-744.
Bourdieu P. Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market. The New Press. 1999.
Chen J, Nadkarni S. It's about Time! CEOs' Temporal Dispositions, Temporal Leadership, and Corporate Entrepreneurship // Administrative Science Quarterly, 2016. Vol. 62. 1: P. 31-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216663504
Cohen D. La Mondialisation et ses ennemis, Paris, Grasset, 2004.
Dahl R. A. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1971.
Dahl R. A. A Preface to Economic Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1985.
Dator J. A., Pratt R., Seo Y. Fairness, Globalization, and Public Institutions: East Asia and Beyond. University of Hawaii Press, 2006.
Defarges P. M. La mondialisation, 10e édition; Paris. Presses Universitaires de France - P. U. F. 2016.
Deutch D. The Fabric of Reality: The Science of Parallel Universes and Its Implications. Penguin. 1998.
Drutman L. The Business of America Is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate (Studies in Postwar American Political Development). USA. Oxford University Press. 2015.
Feynman R. P. The Value of Science // Engineering and Science. Vol. XIX. 1955. Р. 13-15.
Gale D., Shapley L. S. College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage // American Mathematics Monthly. 1962. Vol. 69. P. 9-15. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.2307/2312726.
Good Democratic Leadership. John Kane and Haig Patapan (eds) Oxford University Press. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683840.001.0001.
Goswami A. Quantum Politics, Part III: Saving Democracy. 2015. URL: http://www.amitgoswami.org/2015/07/24/quantum-politics-part-iii.
Haslam A. S. Reicher S. D. Platow M. J. The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Infl and Power. NY: Psychology Press. 2010.
Huntington S. P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press. 1991.
Kane J. The Ethical Paradox of Democratic Leadership // Taiwan Journal of Democracy 2007. 3 (2). P. 33-52.
Kane J., Patapan H. The Democratic Leader. How Democracy Defines, Empowers and Limits its Leaders. 2012.
Kazemi A. A. Quantum Politics: New Methodological Perspective // International Studies Journal (ISJ) 2015. (2011) Vol. 12. N l. P. 89-102.
Keane J. The Life and Death of Democracy. Simon & Schuster. 2009.
Keane J. Quantum Democracy: notes on rethinking territory in contemporary democratic politics. Lecture. 2016. URL: http://www.johnkeane.net/spanish-translation-quantum-democracy-notes- on-rethinking-territory-in-contemporary-democratic-politics.
Lévy J. (dir) L‘invention du Monde. Une géographie de la mondialisation. Presses de Sciences Po. 2007.
Lippmann W. Public Opinion. NY: Macmillan, 1922.
Lippmann W. The Phantom Public. Transaction Publishers. 1925.
Longstreet W. S. Citizenship: The Phantom Core of Social Studies Curriculum // Theory and Research in Social Education 1985. 13 (2). P. 21-29.
Pettinicchio D. Elites, Policy and Social Movements / On the Cross Road of Polity, Political Elites and Mobilization. Ed. by B. Wejnert, P. Parigi. Vol. 24. Emerald Books. 2017. P. 55-190.
Pezzani F. Italy: Lost Sovereignty and Phantom Politics // Business and Economics Journal 2016. 7:225.
Popper K. R. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Routledge. Vol. 1, 2. 1945.
Sandberg M., Lundberg P. Political Institutions and Their Historical Dynamics // PLoS ONE 2012. 7(10): e45838.
Skinner Q. Visions of Politics. Vol. 1: Regarding Method. University of Cambridge, 2002.
Skinner Q., van Gelderen M. Freedom and the Construction of Europe. Cambridge University Press. Vol. 1, 2. 2013.
Soros G. Underwriting Democracy: Encouraging Free Enterprise and Democratic Reform Among the Soviets and in Eastern Europe. NY: Free Press. 1991.
Soros G. Open Society: Reforming Global Capitalism. Public Affairs, 2000.
Soros G. George Soros On Globalization. Public Affairs, 2005.
Stolleis M. Das Auge des Gesetzes: Geschichte einer Metapher. München: C. H. Beck. Verlag. 2004.
Tanasescu M. Rethinking representation: The challenge of nonhumans // Australian Journal of Political Science, 2014. Vol. 49 (1). P. 40-53.
Tesař J. 2015. Quantum Theory of International Relations: Approaches and Possible Gains // Human Aff Vol. 25 (4).
Toffler A. The Third Wave. William Morrow and Company Inc. NY: 1980.
Wallach P. A. Government Decoherence and Its Discontents. Library of Law and Liberty. Indianapolis.2015. URL: http://www.libertylawsite.org/liberty-forum/government-decoherence-and-its-discontents.
Weber M. Politik als Beruf. Munchen/Leipzig GPS 505-560 Separatveroffentlichungen. Stuttgart, 1992.
Weber M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization / trans. by A. M. Henderson,. Parsons. NY: The Free Press. 1947.
