USSR and Contemporary USA: Two Paradigms of the Social Development Deadlock
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-7-111-116Keywords:
парадигма, socialism, social development, progress, ideology, paradigmAbstract
This article contains reflections of the author about two essentially different approaches by the ways of historical social development: liberal and socialist, each of which has provided social progress on a certain interval of time, at the same time, in process of realization and in different degree, each of them was deadlock. The author claims that without consideration of features and specific conditions of historical development of the countries, instilment of the way of social development, brings eventually to the deadlock. The author believes that only following to the natural course of social development of the concrete countries, without his artificial acceleration and taking into account positive experience what offers concrete way, the social progress of the concrete country and state can be provided.Downloads
References
Ленин В. И. Военная программа пролетарской революции // Ленин В. И. ПСС. 5-е изд. М., 1967-1981. Т. 30. С. 133.
Ленин В. И. Государство и революция // Ленин В. И. ПСС. 5-е изд. Т. 33. Гл. 5.
Ленин В. И. Империализм как высшая стадия капитализма // Ленин В. И. ПСС. 5-е изд. Т. 27. С. 299-426.
Маркс К. Критика Готской Программы // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч. Изд. 2-е. М., 1955-1974. Т. 19. С. 9-32.
Маркс К. Немецкая идеология // Маркс К, Энгельс Ф. Соч. Изд. 2-е. Т. 2. С. 3.
Обращение Центрального комитета к Союзу коммунистов // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч. Изд. 2-е. Т. 7. С. 260-267.
Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Манифест Коммунистической партии // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч. Изд. 2-е. Т. 4. С. 419-459.
Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. М.: Эксмо, 2007.