Continuity as Micropolicy of the Modern Companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-9-36-41Keywords:
семейный бизнес, succession, politics, management, power, family businessAbstract
How to transfer power so that what has been created is not destroyed? This question is asked by politicians and business people from time immemorial. The problem of transferring power and management in general is relevant not only for monarchs, but also for business representatives. Provided that business is a family affair, the problem is doubled. The article analyzes various approaches to succession as a micro-policy process.Downloads
References
Волков Д. А. Мотивационные аспекты преемственности в семейном бизнесе // Российское предпринимательство. 2013. No 16. С. 89-96.
Волков Д.А. Преемственность в семейном бизнесе // Инновации и инвестиции. 2015. No 12. С. 54-58.
Делез Ж., Гваттари Ф. Тысяча плато: Капитализм и шизофрения. Екатеринбург: У-Фактория; М.: Астрель, 2010.
Фуко М. Интеллектуалы и власть: Избранные политические статьи, выступления и интервью. М.: Праксис, 2002.
Эткинд А. Фуко и тезис внутренней колонизации // Новое литературное обозрение. 2001. No 49. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2001/49/etkind.html (дата обращения: 14.05.2018).
Atkinson W.P. Succession-management, Jesus-style // Journal of the European Pentecostal Theological Association. 2016. N 2. P. 1-12.
Cabrera-Suarez K., Martin-Santana J. Successor's commitment and succession success: dimensions and antecedents in the small Spanish family firm // The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2012. N 13.
Cesaroni F.M., Sentuti A. Family business succession and external advisors: the relevance of ‘soft' issues // Small Enterprise Research. 2017. N 2. P. 167-188.
Hargreaves A. Leadership succession // The Educational Forum. 2005. N 2.
Holt R., Popp A. Emotion, succession, and the family firm: Josiah Wedgwood & Sons // Business History. 2013. N 6. P. 892-909.
