Role of Institute of Leadership in Formation of Political Culture in the Conditions of Sovereignty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-3-34-40Keywords:
особенности лидерства, politics, society, leadership, political leadership, sovereignty, featuresAbstract
This article analyzes the role of the institution of leadership in the formation of a new political culture in conditions of sovereignty. It should be noted that experience shows that the institution of leadership has really had a decisive influence on the whole further course of development of social and political processes in society. As a result, an activist type of political culture based on democratic principles emerged and affirmed in society.The culture of participation as the main element of human culture in general was characterized by rationality, awareness and expediency. At the same time, it is necessary to know that the level of perception of new cultural values depends on the level of political culture of the political leader itself, since any leader is a reflection of the cultural environment in which it was formed.Downloads
References
Блондель Ж. Политическое лидерство. М., 1992. 135 с.
Денисов В. В. Политическая культура: теория и практика // Философия и общество. 2006. № 1. С. 19-31.
Дубинин Н. П. Наследование биологическое и социальное // Коммунист. 1980. № 11. С. 62-74.
Махмадов А. Н. Риторика и политическая полемика. Душанбе, 2015. 192 с.
Махмадов А. Н., Хоперская Л. Л. Национальное примирение: перспективы развития суверенного таджикского государства. Душанбе, 2017. 168 с.
Хидирзода М. У. Лидерство и управление социально-политическими процессами. Душанбе, 2018. 168 с.
Хидирова М. У. Институт лидерства в контексте трансформационного общества. Душанбе, 2009. 170 с.
Хидирова М. У. Политическое поведение и его особенности. Душанбе, 2007. 139 с.
Рањмонов Э. Ш. Тољикон њамеша ва имрўз (Таджики всегда и сегодня). Душанбе, 1997.