JIT Philosophy in Modern Management Cost Accounting and Performance Management Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-10-68-80Keywords:
управление эффективностью бизнеса, cost accounting methods, key performance indicators, business performance managementAbstract
Currently, traditional cost accounting methods are losing their relevance. Modern production environment is unpredictable and customer-oriented. Product life cycle becomes shorter, and consumers’ tastes are more capricious and fickle. All these factors suggest the need for flexible and adaptive control schemes.Successful decision-making is determined by well-built cost accounting system. The article proposes on the basis of the symbiosis of “just-in-time” approach, adherence to the principles of continuous improvement, and cost accounting methods - Kaizen-costing, standard-costing, target-costing, time-driven activity based costing, backflush accounting and value stream costing - to develop business performance management system that meets the needs of the modern business environment. The principles of continuous improvement, integrated into «Just In Time” management system, expand the horizon of opportunities for strategic management accounting. Zero-inventory philosophy, combined with flexible and adaptable management schemes, can also provide a powerful competitive advantage. The article recommends a system of key performance indicators to monitor the implementation of “Just in Time” philosophy in the symbiosis with these cost accounting methods. Zero-inventory approach has a number of drawbacks. However, integration of concepts with advanced cost accounting techniques will partly offset these shortcomings.The purpose of the article is to study the possibility of integration of «Just in Time” philosophy and advanced cost accounting methods, with respect to their features and peculiarities. The theoretical basis is the hypothesis of improving business performance management system based on “Just in Time” management approach, through its integration with the principles of continuous improvement and modern management approaches, quality assurance and approval.The main result of the article is an enhanced management accounting tools that allow to respond to changes in the environment of the company, develop measures aimed at adapting to these changes and ensuring compliance with the company’s strategy.Downloads
References
Вахрушина М. А. Управленческий учет и менеджмент: синергия единения // Менеджмент и бизнес-администрирование. 2018. № 1. С. 86-93.
Закиева Л. Б., Кожемякин А. Д. Анализ конкурентоспособности и динамики изменения ее структуры на примере отраслей традиционной и альтернативной энергетик // VI Международный молодежный симпозиум по управлению, экономике и финансам (Казань, 5-6 декабря 2017 г.). Сборник научных статей конференции. Казань: Изд-во Казан. ун-та, 2017.
Ивашкевич В. Б. Проблемы теории управленческого учета и контроллинга // Международный бухгалтерский учет. 2016. № 14. С. 34-46.
Соколов А. Ю. Метод учета, планирования, оптимизации и калькулирования затрат, соотносимых со временем производства продукции // Вестник Самарского государственного экономического университета. 2007. № 1. С. 126-130.
Соколов А. Ю. Моделирование и разработка эффективной интегрированной системы исчисления затрат и результатов в рамках управленческого учета // Инновационное развитие экономики. 2016. № 5. С. 185-192.
Adam S. Maiga, Fred A. Jacobs. Activity-Based Cost Management and Manufacturing, Operational and Financial Performance: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach // Advances in Management Accounting 2007. Vol. 16. P. 217-260.
Ramezani A. R., Mahdloo M. Backflush Costing and Backflush Accounting // Academic Journal of Research in Business & Accounting. May 2014. Vol. 2. N 5. P. 1-6.
Brews P., Purohit D. Strategic Planning in Unstable Environments // Long Range Planning. 2007. Vol. 40. P. 64-83.
Claycomb C., Germain R., Dröge C. Total system JIT outcomes: inventory, organization and financial effects. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 29. 2015. P. 612-630.
Danese P., Romano P., Bortolotti T. JIT production, JIT supply and performance: investigating the moderating effects. Industrial Management and Data Systems 112. 2012. P. 441-465.
Green Jr. K. W., Inman R. A., Birou L. M., Whitten D. Total JIT (T-JIT) and its impact on supply chain competency and organizational performance. International Journal of Production Economics 147. P. A. 2014. P. 125-135.
Kádárová Ja., Teplická K., Durkácová M., Vida M. Target Costing Calculation and Economic Gain for Companies // Procedia Economics and Financ. 2015. Vol. 23. P. 1195-1200.
Amasaka K. New JIT, New Management Technology Principle: Surpassing JIT // Procedia Technology. 2014. Vol. 16. P. 1135-1145.
Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. The execution premium: linking strategy to operations for competitive advantage, Harvard Business Press, 2008.
Kaplan R. S., Anderson S. R. Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing, Harvard Business Press, 2004.
Kaplan R. S., Anderson S. R. Time-driven activity-based costing: a simpler and more powerful path to higher profits, Harvard business press, 2007.
Kenneth W., Green Jr., Inman R. A., Birouc L. M. at all. Total JIT (T-JIT) and its impact on supply chain competency and organizational performance // International Journal of Production Economics January 2014. N 147. P. A. P. 125-135.
Micheli P., Manzoni J. Strategic Performance Measurement: Benefits, Limitations and Paradoxes // Long Range Planning. 2010. Vol. 43. P. 465-476.
Kojimaa M., Nakashima K., Ohno K. Performance evaluation of SCM in JIT environment // International Journal of Production Economics October 2008. Vol. 115. Is. 2. P. 439-443.
Omah I., Okolie J. U. Spare Parys Management (SPM): An Inventory Control through JIT Philosophy // International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences. February 2013. Vol. 2. N 2. P. 150-163. Used 153-158.
Peden A. L., Baker J. J. Allocating physicians overhead costs to services: An econometric- accounting-activity based-approach // J. Health Care Finance. 2001. Vol. 29. P. 57-75.
Elhunia Redha M., Ahmad M. Munir. Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Production Evaluation in Oil and Gas Sector // Procedia Manufacturing. 2017. Vol. 11. P. 718-724.
Zamecnik R., Rajnoha R. Strategic business performance management on the base of controlling and managerial information support // Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015. Vol. 26. P. 769- 776 (770-771).
Rudd J., Greenley G., Beatson A., Lings I. Strategic planning and performance: Extending the debate // Journal of Business Research. 2008. Vol. 61. P. 99-108.
Sokolov A. Y., Bikmukhametova Ch. Z. Accounting for over-heads in Russia: historical aspects // Academy of Marketing Studies Journal. Vol. 20. Special Issue, 2016. P. 115-120.
Iqbal T., Huq F., Khurrum M., Bhuttab S. Agile manufacturing relationship building with TQM, JIT, and firm performance: An exploratory study in apparel export industry of Pakistan // International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 203, September 2018. P. 24-37.
Tang S., Gao F. Cian and D Wang. An improved activity-based costing model for product cost estimation applied in a complex manufacturing environment // High Technol. Lett. 2013. Vol. 19 (2). P. 125-131.
