Comparison of Old-age Pension Policy in China and Russia: the Common and the Specific

Authors

  • Tianhong Chen Guangdong Institute of Public Administration Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-7-68-82

Keywords:

China, Russia, Comparison

Abstract

In the process of transforming from planned economy to market economy, both China and Russia faced the issue of pension reform. There are similarities in the reform and development process and the system model of the pension security system in China and Russia. Transition from planned economy to market economy and aggravation of population aging are main reasons for the reform of pension system in both countries. Under the influence of the World Bank and other international organizations, China and Russia have gradually established a multi-tier pension system, with the state, enterprises and individuals sharing the pension costs. Differences also exist in the old-age security system of China and Russia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tianhong Chen, John Turner. Fragmentation in Social Security Old-Age Benefit Provision in China. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 2015 (2). P. 107-122. (in English)

Tianhong Chen, John Turner. Extending social security coverage to the rural sector in China. International Social Security Review, 2014 (67). P. 49-70. (in English)

The World Bank, Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth, Oxford University Press, 1994. (in English)

The World Bank, Old Age Income Support in the 21 st Century: an International Perspective on Pension System and Reform, World Bank, 2005. (in English)

Chen Yun-ying, He Fang. Russia's Pension System Reform in 2018 under the Current Russian-Economic Background. Northeast Asia Economic Research, 2019 (4). P. 109-120. (in Chinese)

Downloads

Published

2020-12-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chen T. Comparison of Old-age Pension Policy in China and Russia: the Common and the Specific // Administrative Consulting. 2020. no. 7. P. 68–82. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-7-68-82