Elections as an Institution of Trust: Features of Functioning in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • N.A. Baranov Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA) Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-10-10-21

Keywords:

democratic distrust, remote e-voting, early voting, liberal distrust, Mobile Voting, postal voting

Abstract

The article is devoted to identifying the features of the functioning of elections as a democratic institution in a pandemic. Based on the constructivist approach and the method of comparative analysis, the author attempts to conceptualize elections as an institution of trust and to characterize the electoral practices used by European countries in the electoral process. Based on the research of D. Coleman, N. Luhmann, R. Putnam, P. Roseanvallon, P. Shtompka, I. Krastev, F. Fukuyama, D. Gambetto, the author, despite the ambiguity of the concept of “trust”, concludes that it is essential role in the relationship between government and society. Mistrust means the alienation of society from the social sphere, lack of faith in justice, a feeling of uncertainty and a threat emanating from government institutions. Trust creates a moral environment in society that promotes development and effective problem solving. In an atmosphere of trust, various voting options are possible, which are not disputed by citizens, and elections become the most important indicator of this trust. Pandemic restrictions have left a significant imprint on electoral practices; nevertheless, there is an obvious trend towards the active introduction of remote electronic voting, which has not yet reached perfection, but is a strategically priority in the ongoing election campaigns. At the same time, increased requirements are imposed on the safety of the electoral process, its normative regulation, openness and publicity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Алексеев Р. А., Абрамов А. В. Проблемы и перспективы применения электронного голосования и технологии избирательного блокчейна в России и за рубежом // Гражданин. Выборы. Власть. 2020. № 1 (15). С. 9-21.

Бессет Дж. М. Тихий голос разума. Делиберативная демократия и американская система государственной власти. М.: Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН), 2011. 336 с.

Борисов И. Б., Головин А. Г., Игнатов А. В. Выборы в мире: электронное голосование / под общ. ред. И. Б. Борисова. М.: Российский общественный институт избирательного права, 2020. 218 с.

Даль Р. Демократия и ее критики. М.: РОССПЭН, 2003. 576 с.

Крастев И. Управление недоверием. М.: Европа, 2014. 128 с.

Патнэм Р. Чтобы демократия сработала. Гражданские традиции в современной Италии. М.: Ad Marginem, 1996. 287 с.

Постковидный мир: "Мы в Европе не до конца понимаем, чего хотим" // Глобальный диалог. Euronews. 26.04.2021. URL: https://ru.euronews.com/2021/04/26/ru-tgc-effects-of-covid (дата обращения: 11.07.2021).

Розанваллон П. Контрдемократия: политика в эпоху недоверия // Неприкосновенный запас. 2012. № 4. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2012/4/kontrdemokratiya-politika-v-epohu-nedoveriya.html (дата обращения: 22.06.2021).

Синявская О. Рожденные пандемией // Россия в глобальной политике. 2020. № 5. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/rozhdyonnye-pandemiej/ (дата обращения: 11.07.2021).

Тульчинский Г. Л., Лисенкова А. А. Проблема доверия и современные информационнокоммуникативные технологии // Российский гуманитарный журнал. 2016. Том 5. № 2. С. 233-242.

Франк Л. С. Из размышлений о русской революции // Новый мир. 1990. № 4. С. 207-226.

Фукуяма Ф. Доверие: социальные добродетели и путь к процветанию / пер. с англ. М.: ООО "Издательство АСТ": ЗАО НПП "Ермак", 2004. 730 с.

Штомпка П. Социология. Анализ современного. 2-е изд. М.: Логос, 2010. 664 с.

Arrow K. J. The Limits of Organization. New York: W. W. Norton, 1974. 86 p.

Coleman J. S. Grundlagen der Sozialtheorie. Bd. 1. München: Oldenburg, 1991. XVI. 474 s.

Heinmaa A. Special Voting Arrangements (SVAs) in Europe: In-Country Postal, Early, Mobile and Proxy Arrangements in Individual Countries. 19.10.2020 // International Institute for democracy and electoral assistance. URL: https://www.idea.int/news-media/news/special-voting-arrangements-svas-europe-country-postal-early-mobile-and-proxy (дата обращения: 10.07.2021).

Heinmaa A., Kalandadze N. Special Voting Arrangements in Europe: Postal, Early and Mobile Voting. Webinar series report, november 2020. Stockholm: International IDEA, 2021. 34 p.

James Toby S., Alihodzic Sead. When Is It Democratic to Postpone an Election? Elections During Natural Disasters, Covid-19, and Emergency Situations // Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy. 2020. Vol. 19. N 3. P. 344-362. URL: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/elj.2020.0642 (дата обращения: 24.06.2021).

Luhmann N. Familiarity, confidence, trust: problems and alternatives. In: Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford: Basil Blacjwell, 2008. P. 94-107. URL: https://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/users/gambetta/Trust_making%20and%20breaking%20cooperative%20relations.pdf (дата обращения: 11.07.2021).

Mazzucato M. Capitalism After the Pandemic: Getting the Recovery Right. In: Foreign Affairs. 2020. N 6. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-10-02/capitalism-after-covid-19-pandemic (дата обращения: 11.07.2021).

Rosanvallon P. Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 336 p.

Spinelli A. Managing Elections Under the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Republic of Korea's Crucial Test. Stockholm: International IDEA. 2020. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?hl=en&lr=&id=LQHeDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=info:NN2JaIRGdkJ:scholar.google.com&ots=_1Mp1Zs88S&sig=zAbmXwpRYZUj4785mCMFiv3G1E0&redir_esc=yv=onepage&q&f=false (дата обращения: 24.06.2021).

Tarouco G. Covid-19 and the Brazilian 2020 Municipal Elections Case Study, 19 February 2021. Stockholm: IDEA, 2021. 18 p.

Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations / ed. Diego Gambetta. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988. 246 p.

Wendt A. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. In: International Organization. 1992. Vol. 46. N 2. P. 391-425.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Baranov N. Elections as an Institution of Trust: Features of Functioning in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic // Administrative Consulting. 2021. no. 10. P. 10–21. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-10-10-21