E-Government and Citizens: An Empirical Study of Interaction on the Official Portal in St. Petersburg
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-12-48-69Keywords:
e-Government, e-interaction, involvement of citizens, the official portal of government, performance discipline meters on the porta, activity of citizensAbstract
This article examines the conformity of e-government theoretical aspects with practical outcomes of interaction between executive authorities and citizens while governance optimization. The empirical part of this study evaluates the current level of communication between local authorities and citizens via electronic resources based on the portal “Our Saint Petersburg” data. Citizens capacities and claims causes are revealed as well as portal functioning problems over the past two years.Downloads
References
Голубева А. А., Соколова Е. В. Инновации в общественном секторе: введение в проблему // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Сер. Менеджмент. 2010. № 4. С. 28-57.
Горожане стали чаще использовать портал "Наш Санкт-Петербург" для решения городских проблем. URL: https://goo.gl/rU7uj8 (дата обращения: 20.03.2018).
Кайсарова В. П. Теория и практика управления сферой публичных услуг // Вестник СанктПетербургского университета. Сер. Экономика. 2010. № 2. С. 88-98.
Красильников Д. Г., Сивинцева О. В., Троицкая Е. А. Современные западные управленческие модели: синтез New public management и Good governance // Ars Administrandi. 2014. № 2. С. 45-62.
Механизм работы с обращениями граждан ждет модернизация. URL: https://goo.gl/oEjCHS (дата обращения: 10.09.2018).
Окинавская хартия Глобального информационного общества. URL: https://goo.gl/fMnXQg (дата обращения: 12.04.2018).
Портал "Наш Санкт-Петербург" принял миллионное сообщение. URL: https://goo.gl/Lmp1jp (дата обращения: 25.08.2018).
Baker M., Coaffee J., Sherriff G. Achieving successful participation in the new UK spatial planning system // Planning, Practice & Research. 2007. N 22 (1). P. 79-93.
Bovaird T. Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services // Public administration review. 2007. N 67 (5). P. 846-860.
Bryson J. M., Quick K. S., Slotterback C. S., Crosby B. C. Designing public participation processes // Public administration review. 2013. N 73 (1). P. 23-34.
Carman C. The Process is the Reality: Perceptions of Procedural Fairness and Participatory Democracy // Political Studies. 2010. N 58 (4). P. 731-751.
Dugdale A. et al. Accessing e-government: challenges for citizens and organizations // International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2005. N 71 (1). P. 109-118.
Ertiö T. P. Participatory apps for urban planning - space for improvement // Planning Practice & Research. 2015. N 30 (3). P. 303-321.
Fraga E. Trends in e-government how to plan, design, secure, and measure e-government // Government Management Information Sciences (GMIS) Conference. 2002.
Gazley B. Beyond the contract: The scope and nature of informal government-nonprofit partnerships // Public administration review. 2008. N 68 (1). P. 141-154.
Harder C. T., Jordan M. M. The transparency of county websites: A content analysis // Public Administration Quarterly. 2013. P. 103-128.
Holmes D. eGov: eBusiness strategies for government. Boston: Nicholas Brealey Publishing. 2001.
Hood C. C., Margetts H. Z. The tools of government in the digital age. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 2007.
Hough R. Do Legislative Petitions Systems Enhance the Relationship between Parliament and Citizen? // The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2012. N 18 (3-4). P. 479-495.
Johnson P. A., Sieber R. E. Motivations driving government adoption of the Geoweb // GeoJournal. 2012. N 77 (5). P. 667-680.
Johnston E. W., Hansen D. L. Design lessons for smart governance infrastructures // Transforming American governance: Rebooting the public square, 2011. P. 197-212.
Linders D. From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media // Government Information Quarterly. 2012. N 29 (4). P. 446-454.
Maguire D. J., Longley P. A. The emergence of geoportals and their role in spatial data infrastructures // Computers, environment and urban systems. 2005. N 29 (1). P. 3-14.
Meijer A. J., Curtin D., Hillebrandt M. Open government: connecting vision and voice // International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2012. N 78 (1). P. 10-29.
Ronaghan S. A. Benchmarking e-government: a global perspective. Assessing the progress of the UN member states // United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration & American Society for Public Administration. 2002.
Rowe G., Frewer L. J. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation // Science, technology, & human values. 2000. N 25 (1). P. 3-29.
Sheppard J. Online petitions in Australia: Information, opportunity and gender // Australian Journal of Political Science. 2015. N 50 (3). P. 480-495
Sieber R. Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework // Annals of the association of American Geographers. 2006. N 96 (3). P. 491-507.
Tapscott D. The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1996.
UNE-government Survey 2014. E-government for the Future We Want. Retrieved on 19 April 2016. URL: https://goo.gl/GD6ywa (accessed: 20.03.2018).
