Interaction between the Arctic and Non-Arctic States in Scientific Research and Practical Development of the Geopolitical Potential of the Arctic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-3-17-27Keywords:
geopolitics, geopolitical potential, Russian Arctic, sustainable development, Russian geopolitical space, Great redistribution of the ArcticAbstract
Aim. Reveal the methodological role of ideas about the geopolitical potential of the state in making managerial decisions in the development of the space of the Russian Arctic. The article presents an overview of fundamental research and articles by foreign authors that addresses the problem of realizing the geopolitical potential of the Arctic.Tasks. Development of the principles of geopolitical forecasting based on mathematical modeling of the geopolitical potential of the state and systematization of developments on the spatial development of the Russian Arctic as part of Greater Eurasia.Methods. Mathematical modeling of geopolitical processes, medium-term forecasting of the spatial development of the Russian Arctic in the face of challenges from foreign states claiming its natural resources and territorial waters.Results. It confirms the need to include scientific developments in the methodological apparatus of geopolitical research to identify qualitative and quantitative definitions of the geopolitical potential of the state, which contributes to ensuring the national security of Russia and improving its spatial development.Conclusions. The transition to the sixth technological mode is not limited to a radical transformation of the country's production complex, but also implies the need to create a unified infrastructure architecture for the Greater Eurasia (“smart” Eurasia), into which the Russian Arctic organically fits.Downloads
References
Бакланов П.Я. Геополитические факторы в региональном развитии // Таможенная политика России на Дальнем Востоке. 2020. № 4 (93). С. 75-83.
Винокуров Г. Н., Коняхин Б. А., Подкорытов Ю. А. Геополитический статус Китая как фактор российской политики ядерного сдерживания Соединенных Штатов // Стратегическая стабильность. 2008. № 2. С. 199-202.
Додин Д.А. Устойчивое развитие Арктики (проблемы и перспективы). СПб.: Наука, 2005. 283 с.
Кефели И.Ф., Кузнецов Д.И. Евразийский вектор глобальной геополитики. М.: Издательство Юрайт, 2018. С. 199-202.
Корнеев О. Ю. Зачем России палеозой Арктиды? Экспедиция "Арктика-2012". СПб.: Нестор-История, 2018. С. 10, 230-233.
Кучинская М. Е. Арктика в фокусе внимания США и НАТО и интересы безопасности России // Проблемы национальной стратегии. 2020. № 1 (58). С. 68-89.
Лукин А.В., Якунин В. И. Евразийская интеграция и развитие Азиатской России // Пути и пояса Евразии. Национальные и международные проекты развития на Евразийском пространстве и перспективы их сопряжения / под ред. А.В. Лукина, В. И. Якунина. М.: Весь Мир, 2019. 416 с.
Лукин Ю. Ф. Многомерность пространства Арктики. Архангельск, 2017. 250 с.
Осипов Г.В., Садовничий В. А., Якунин В. И. Интегральная евразийская инфраструктурная система как приоритет национального развития страны. М.: ИСПИ РАН, 2013. 62 с.
Российская Арктика: современная парадигма / под ред. акад. А. И. Татаркина. СПб.: Нестор-История, 2014. 844 с.
Cline R.S. World Power Assessment. A Calculus of Strategic Drift. Washington, 1975.
Interim National Security Strategic Guidance. The White House, Washington, march, 2021.
Diener A. C., Grant A., Bennett M.M. Northeast Asia in regional perspective // Asian Geographer. 2021. Vol. 38. N 2. P. 95-118. DOI: 10.1080/10225706.2021.1952778.
Steinveg B. The role of conferences within Arctic governance // Polar Geography. 2021. Vol. 44. N 1. P. 37-54. DOI: 10.1080/1088937X.2020.1798540.
Gricius G. Conceptualising the arctic as a zone of conflict: The winner of the 15th anniversary award // Central European Journal of International and Security Studies. 2021. N 15 (4). P. 4-30. DOI:10.51870/CEJISS.A150401.
Johnson B. T. Sensing the Arctic: Situational awareness and the future of northern security // International Journal. 2021. N 76 (3). P. 404-426. DOI: 10.1177/00207020211048424.
Lavengood Z. The evolving arctic in the world-system // Journal of World-Systems Research. 2021. N 27 (2). P. 468-493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2021.1042.
Morgunova M. The role of the socio-technical regime in the sustainable energy transition: A case of the Eurasian Arctic // Extractive Industries and Society. 2021. N 8 (3). DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2021.100939.
Ramage J., Jungsberg L., Wang S., Westermann S. at al. Population living on permafrost in the Arctic // Population and Environment.2021. N 43 (1). P. 22-38. DOI: 10.1007/s11111-020-00370-6.
Raspotnik A., Østhagen A. What about the Arctic? The European Union's Geopolitical Quest for Northern Space // Geopolitics. 2021. N 26 (4). P. 1150-1174. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2019.1670643.
Samarina V. P., Skufina T. P., Savon D.Yu., Shinkevich A. I. Management of externalities in the context of sustainable development of the russian arctic zone // Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021. N 13 (14). DOI: 10.3390/su13147749.
Väätänen V., Zimmerbauer K. Territory - network interplay in the co-constitution of the Arctic and ‘to-be' Arctic states // Territory, Politics, Governance. 2021. N 8 (3). P. 372-389. DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2018.1559759.
Wilson R. E. Analyzing frenemies: An Arctic repertoire of cooperation and rivalry // Political Geography. 76 (2020): 102072. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102072.
Young O.R. Arctic futures - future arctics? // Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021; 13(16):9420. DOI: 10.3390/su13169420.
Druzhinin A. G. The Strongholds of Russian Coastal Borderlands: economic dynamics amid geopolitical turbulence // Baltic Region. 2020. N 12 (3). P. 89-104. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2020-3-6.
