The Environmental Agenda in the Election Programs of Russian Political Parties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-8-24-40Keywords:
environmental agenda, climate agenda, election programs, political partiesAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of environmental agenda in the Russian political field on the example of the analysis of the election programs of Russian political parties. The study analyzes the factors and features of the inclusion of the environmental issues in the political programs of Russian political parties. The main environmental problems raised by political parties and the dynamics of its considering were highlighted, and the specific of their discursive representation were analyzed. The study revealed the following features of the appeal of political actors to environmental issues: techno-utopianism as an unconditional belief in “green technologies” that does not imply major institutional changes; eco-populism, manifested in the connection of environmental problems with more popular social issues; ritualization as a formal mention of the “green” agenda, which does not receive careful consideration. Special attention was paid to the (un)formation of the climate agenda in Russia, which showed the limitations of the global process influence on the Russian political agenda. The study was carried out on the basis of a qualitative methodology.Agencies
Исследование выполнено при поддержке Центра исследований и прикладных разработок СЗИУ РАНХиГС (конкурс «Научное наставничество — 2022»)Downloads
References
Бычкова О. В. «Умное регулирование»: как предотвратить появление необоснованных регулирующих правил : учеб. пособие. СПб. : Издательство Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2018.
Власов Н. «Зеленые» в ФРГ: новая «народная партия»? //Современная Европа. 2019. № 2 (87). С. 118–129.
Вульфович Р. М., Ефремова М. С. Современное состояние «зеленых» партий: Россия, Европа, мир // Управленческое консультирование. 2022. № 8 (164). С. 15–27.
Гольбрайх В. Б. Зеленые партии в России и в мире. Попытка сравнительного анализа // Социология вчера, сегодня, завтра. 2008. С. 259–278.
Кастельс М. Власть коммуникации. М. : Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2016.
Красильникова Н. А. «Свои» и «чужие» в дискурсе политических движений «зеленых» в Англии, России и США // WELT IN DER SPRACHE. 2005. С. 207–220.
Мыльников М. А. Политическая программа и идеология «зеленых» партий в России: сравнительный анализ // Политика и общество. 2017. № 2. С. 1–10.
Расторгуев С. В. Экологическая проблематика в предвыборных программах парламентских партий России в 2021 г // Власть. 2022. Т. 30. № 2. С. 59–66.
Цепилова О. Д. От институционализации к политизации: сравнительный анализ возникновения и развития зеленых партий Западной Европы и политического крыла зеленого движения России // Власть и элиты. 2022. Т. 9. № 2. С. 96–121.
Bouzarovski Stefan and Mark Bassin. Energy and identity: Imagining Russia as a hydrocarbon superpower // The New Geographies of Energy. Routledge, 2013. P. 94–105.
Bridgman P., Davis G. What use is a policy cycle? Plenty, if the aim is clear // Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2003. Vol. 62. N 3. P. 98–102.
Burchell J. The evolution of green politics: development and change within European Green Parties. Routledge, 2014.
Chepurina M. What’s behind Russia’s climate policy? Small steps towards an intrinsic interest // Working Papers, 2017. N 03/12.
Cohen M. D., March J. G., Olsen J. P. A garbage can model of organizational choice // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1972. 17 (1): 1–25. DOI: 10.2307/2392088. JSTOR 2392088
Dumont P., Bäck H. Why so few, and why so late? Green parties and the question of governmental participation //European Journal of Political Research. 2006. Vol. 45. P. S35–S67.
Gilley B. Authoritarian environmentalism and China’s response to climate change // Environmental Politics. 2012. Vol. 21. N 2. P. 287–307.
GlobalScan. Report. 2022 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://globescan.com/2022/01/26/globescan-global-public-opinion-research-on-nature (дата обращения: 10. 04. 2023).
Henry L. A. Between transnationalism and state power: the development of Russia’s post-Soviet environmental movement // Environmental Politics. 2010. Vol. 19. N 5. P. 756–781.
Howlett M., McConnell A., Perl A. Moving policy theory forward: Connecting multiple stream and advocacy coalition frameworks to policy cycle models of analysis // Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2017. Vol. 76. N 1. P. 65–79.
Jann W., Wegrich K. Theories of the policy cycle // Handbook of public policy analysis. Routledge, 2017. P. 69–88.
Kingdon J. W., Stano E. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston : Little, Brown, 1984. Vol. 45. P. 165–169.
Lasswell H. The Decision Process: Seven Categories of Functional Analysis. College Park, Maryland : University of Maryland Press, 1956.
Martus E. Municipal Solid Waste Management in Russia: Protest, Policy, and Politics / E. Martus // Russian analytical digest. 2020. N 261. P. 2–6.
Martus E. Policymaking and Policy Framing: Russian Environmental Politics under Putin // Europe-Asia Studies. 2021. P. 1–21.
Poguntke T. Green parties in national governments: From protest to acquiescence? // Environmental Politics. 2002. Vol. 11. N 1. P. 133–145.
Pralle S. B. Agenda-setting and climate change //Environmental Politics. 2009. Vol. 18. N 5. P. 781–799.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Utkin S.R., Stikhin I.V., Tulaeva S.A.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN OXTERM
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)
