The Architecture of the Global Geo-Economics: Pre-Determination of the Crisis and the Vector of Transformations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-2-32-49

Keywords:

periphery of the global economy, semi-periphery, interdependence, investment capitalism, transnational corporations

Abstract

IntroductionThe dramatic nature on contemporary crisis of global political and economic architecture is determined by two factors: the deep degradation of nation-state systems of political and economic management and unfinished construction of the new system of global geo-economics relevant to the ongoing political transformations. The synergy of the two factors formed the effect of chaotization of economically important geographic and sectorial industrial environments. That factors explains the fact that the economic interdependence interrelationships that were regarded earlies as critical were dismantled so easy.Purpose and importanceThe significance of the research is emphasized by starting phases of structural transformations of the system of global politics and economics that we witness at this point taking into consideration that Russia is a part of the global system despite the special status of the country. And it is necessary to address the on-going changes and a historical process. The goal of the article is to deconstruct the underling mechanisms that US and transnational elites use to manage the global geo-economic trends through the transition to system of economic regionalization.MethodsThe article is part of the research that author conducts since 2019. The intermediate results of the study were published in several major scientific, political and discussion platforms. The taken article is based upon the generalization of the experience of the global geo-economic transformations that are reflected in the different formats of the institutionalization. The analysis involves a wide circle of analytical and experts' assessments regarding the perspectives of development of the global economic architecture.ResultsThe main scientific result of the article is to reconstruct the global geo-economic architecture that was planned for development in the period of mature America-centric globalization. The critical breakpoints that jeopardized the integrity of the global geo-economic environment are formulated. And in those breakpoints the scenario of «force geo-economics» can be employed. The variants of the post-crisis re-institutionalization in the neo-global world are outlined.Development and discussionThe article is the means to outline for the discussion the authors' conclusion that are based upon the reflection of the period of dismantlement of the economic system of the mature globalization. The research creates a basis for clarification of the perspective status of the geo-economic periphery and semi-periphery which becomes a vital segment of the world economy. The article supplements the research emerged in Russia and in the West that addresses the issue of the new economic geography of the neo-global world. The article also gives the opportunity to clarify the perspective niche that Russia can occupy in the perspective geoeconomic architecture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • D.G. Evstafiev, Higher School of Economics, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

    Dmitry G. Evstafiev, Professor of the Institute of Media of the Faculty of Creative Industries; Professor of the Department of Theory of Law and State, Candidate of Political Sciences

    Moscow

References

Аватков В. А. Сквозь кризисы к стабильному «неосманизму». Политические итоги Турции 2021 года // Свободная мысль. 2022. № 1 (1691). C. 115–126.

Бжезинский З. Выбор: Глобальное господство или глобальное лидерство. Пер. с англ. М. : Международные отношения, 2004. 288 с.

Валлерстайн И. Миросистемный анализ. Введение. Изд. 2-е, испр. М. : УРСС: ЛЕНАНД, 2018. 304 с.

Евстафьев Д. Г., Цыганова Л. А. Постглобальная модель социального развития: диалектика преемственности и отрицания // Век глобализации. 2022. № 1 (41). С. 42–54.

Захаров А. Н. Перспективы реиндустриализации развитых экономик (США, Канада и Австралия) // Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2018. № 1. С. 213–245.

Манойло А. В., Зайцев А. Я. Международно-правовой статус частных военных компаний // Вестник Российской академии наук. 2020. Т. 90. № 1. С. 47–55.

Романова Т. Дискурс о суверенитете Европейского Союза: содержание и последствия // Современная Европа. 2021. № 5. С. 32‒44.

Слука Н. А. Геодемографические феномены глобальных городов. М. — Смоленск : Ойкумена, 2009. 317 с.

Спенс М. Следующая конвергенция: будущее экономического роста в мире, живущем на разных скоростях. М. : Издательство института Гайдара, 2013. 336 c.

Стиглиц Дж. Великое разделение: Неравенство в обществе или что делать оставшимся 99% населения. М. : Эксмо, 2016, 480 с.

Терборн Й. Города власти. Город, нация, народ, глобальность. М. : Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики, 2019. 472 с.

Фукуяма Ф. Идентичность: Стремление к признанию и политика неприятия. М : Альпина Паблишер, 2019. 256 с.

Фукуяма Ф. Угасание государственного порядка. М. : Издательство АСТ, 2017. 704 с.

Хаас Р. Мировой беспорядок. М. : АСТ, 2019, 320 с.

Цыганков В. В. Миросистемный анализ: «твердое ядро» и «защитный пояс» // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2012. № 4 (20). С. 95–101.

Шваб К., Вэнхэм П. Капитализм всеобщего блага: новая модель мировой экономики. М. : Эксмо, 2022. 352 с.

Шумкоски Г. Глобальный трансфер неолиберальных моделей и доктрина суверенного государства // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Сер.: Международные отношения. 2022. № 4 (22). С. 771–787.

Chase-Dunn Ch. Comparing World Systems: Toward a Theory of Semipheral Development // Comparative Civilizations Review. 1988. Vol. 19. N 19. Art. 3 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol19/iss19/3 (дата обращения: 15.02.2024).

Daalder I., Lindsay J. The Empty Throne. American Abdication of Global Leadership. New York : Public Affairs, 2018. 239 p.

Friedman T. The world is Flat. New York : Farrar, Straus and Giraux. 2005. 488 p.

Haas R. How a World Order Ends. And What Comes in Its Wake // Foreign Affairs. January/ February. 2019 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-12-11/how-world-order-ends?cid=int-nbb&pgtype=hpg (дата обращения: 15.02.2024).

Haas R. Present at the Destruction. Trump’s Final Act Has Accelerated the Onset of a Post-American World // Foreign Affairs. 2021. January 11. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-01-11/present-destruction (дата обращения: 15.02.2024).

Nye J.Jr. How Sharp Power Threatens Soft Power. The Right and Wrong Ways to Respond to Authoritarian Influence // Foreign Affairs, January, 24, 2018 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2018-01-24/how-sharp-power-threatens-softpower (дата обращения: 15.02.2024).

Downloads

Published

2024-03-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Evstafiev D. The Architecture of the Global Geo-Economics: Pre-Determination of the Crisis and the Vector of Transformations // Administrative Consulting. 2024. no. 2. P. 32–49. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-2-32-49

Коды статьи

  • EDN EVIOVE
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)