Sociological Conceptualization of the Concept of “Driver” in the Context of Solving Problems of Development of Socio-Humanitarian Research at Russian Universities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-3-162-178

Keywords:

university management, scientific and pedagogical workers, quality of scientific research, subsystem of science management at a university, social system, social processes

Abstract

These days, management studies and domestic economic and sociological research frequently employ the term “driver.” Additionally, this concept's cognitive capacity is significantly reduced by the lack of an agreed-upon definition. The article's purpose is to demonstrate the concept of “drivers” heuristic potential for sociological analysis of issues related to the growth of sociohumanitarian research in Russian universities. Three components of the university's social structure-academic ethics compliance, graduate school, and online academic communities- are regarded as internal drivers of socio-humanitarian research in Russian universities after firstconceptualizing the term “driver” from the standpoint of sociological theory. Study design. This is a pilot project that uses secondary data analysis as its foundation. The information theory developed by K. Shannon provides the theoretical framework that enables us to identify the characteristics of the driver that set it apart from other system mediating components. The frameworks of institutional analysis and the theory of social action are used in the process of sociological conceptualization. This enables us to draw attention to the social system's motivator's subjective element. Results. A general definition of the concept of a driver is given, and two of its key attributes - its requirement and information recoding - are emphasized. It is demonstrated that the sociological reading of the driver is linked to an evaluation of the degree of functionality of the effects of its operation on the social structure. The personal qualities of the individuals involved in its work define the nature of these consequences. In this sense, the driver can influence the social system's growth as well as its stagnation. University research can be internally motivated by a variety of factors, such as upholding academic ethics standards, successfully implementing postgraduate programs, and founding and moderating online academic communities. The novelty of the results obtained is associated with the implementation of technical terms into socio-humanitarian knowledge, which made it possible to give a more rigorous definition of the concept of driver in relation to the analysis of social changes and processes. The article will be of interest to science administrators at universities.

Agencies

Статья подготовлена в рамках выполнения научно-исследовательской работы государственного задания РАНХиГС.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • M.A. Kashina, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)

    Marina A. Kashina, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher of the Research Laboratory of Strategic Planning and Eurasian Integration, Doctor of Political Sciences

    Researcher ID: ABA-7579-2020

    Saint Petersburg

  • V.A. Vasilyeva, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)

    Valeria A. Vasilyeva, senior lecturer at the Department of Comparative Political Studies

    Researcher ID: D-2131-2014, Scopus ID : 57211992677

    Saint Petersburg

  • S. Tkach, Saint-Petersburg State University

    Sergey Tkach, leading sociologist of the Center for Applied Sociology

    Researcher ID: HKV-6887-2023

    Saint Petersburg

References

Абрамов Р. Н., Груздев И. А., Терентьев Е. А., Захарова У. С., Григорьева А. В. Университетские преподаватели и цифровизация образования: накануне дистанционного форс-мажора // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2020. Т. 24. № 2. С. 59–74. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2020.02.014

Амбарова П. А., Зборовский Г. Е. Научно-педагогическое сообщество в российских вузах в условиях осуществления программы «Приоритет-2030»: проблемы и перспективы // Высшее образование в России. 2022. Т. 31. № 1. C. 59–71.

Андерсен А. П. К вопросу о правовых механизмах минимизации рисков в проектах ГЧП // Международный научно-исследовательский журнал. 2016. Т. 10–1. № 52. С. 100–102. DOI: 10.18454/IRJ.2016.52.017

Бедный Б. И., Сапунов М. Б. и др. Новая модель российской аспирантуры: проблемы и перспективы (круглый стол) // Высшее образование в России. 2019. Т. 28. № 1. С. 130– 146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-1-130-146

Биричева Е. В., Фаттахова З. А. Эффективность взаимодействия научного руководителя и аспиранта в вузе и в академии наук // Высшее образование в России. 2021. Т. 30. № 1. С. 9–22. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617–2021-30-1-9-22

Борисевич М. Н. Основы информационных технологий. М. : Русайнс, 2022. 458 с.

Вебер М. Хозяйство и общество: очерки понимающей социологии. Господство. М. : Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики, 2019. 544 с.

Веселов Ю. В., Капусткина Е. В., Карапетян Р. В. [и др.]. Экономическая социология: теория и история. СПб. : Нестор-История, 2012. 760 с.

Ефимов В. С., Лаптева А. В. Цифровизация в системе приоритетов развития российских университетов: экспертный взгляд // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2018. Т. 22. № 4 (116). C. 52–67. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2018.04.040

Иванова Л. Н., Терская Г. А. Точки роста и драйверы роста: к вопросу о содержании понятий // Журнал институциональных исследований. 2015. Т. 7. № 2. С. 120–133. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2015.7.2.120-133

Макконнелл К. Р., Брю С. Л. Экономикс: принципы, проблемы и политика // Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies. М. : Республика, 1992, 1152 c.

Новиков С. В. Структура, основные драйверы и тенденции развития инновационной экосистемы современного университета // Экономика и управление: научно-практический журнал. 2021. № 2 (158). С. 41–49. DOI 10.34773/EU.2021.2.7

Носкова Т. Н., Павлова Т. Б., Яковлева О. И. ИКТ-инструменты профессиональной деятельности педагога: сравнительный анализ российского и европейского опыта // Интеграция образования. 2018. Т. 22. № 1 (90). С. 25–45. DOI 10.15507/1991-9468.090.022.201801.025-045

Серков П. С., Волков Ю. К. Концепции направленности исторического процесса в философии и социологии истории // Приволжский научный вестник. 2015. Т. 12–2. № 52. С. 151–157.

Хайлбронер Р. Философы от мира сего: великие экономические мыслители: их жизнь, эпоха и идеи // The Worldly Philosophers: The Lives, Times and Ideas of the Great Economic Thinkers. М. : КоЛибри, 2008. 430 с.

Штомпка П. Социология социальных изменений. М. : Аспект-пресс, 1996. 416 c.

Anderson M. S., Shaw M. A., Steneck N. H., Konkle E., Kamata T. Research Integrity and Misconduct in the Academic Profession // Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. 2013. Vol. 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5836-0_5

Bazana P. Academic Dishonesty // International Journal of Testing. 2002. N 2. P. 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2002.9669499

Breslow S. J. Accounting for neoliberalism: “Social drivers” in environmental management // Marine Policy. 2015. N 61. P. 420–429.

Chasanidou D., Elvesæter B., Berre A. J. Enabling team collaboration with task management tools. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Open Collaboration. 2016. August. P. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957792.2957799

Crocker J., Cooper M. Addressing Scientific Fraud // Science. 2011. N 334. P. 1182–1182. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216775

Cuadrado D., Salgado J., Moscoso S. Prevalence and Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: Towards a Sustainable University // Sustainability. 2019. N 11 (21). P. 6062. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216062

Dezi L., Santoro G., Monge F., Zhao Y. Assessing the impact and antecedents of university scientific research on firms’ innovation commercialization // International Journal of Technology Management. 2018. Vol. 78. N 1/2. P. 88–106.

Khaled K. Scientific fraud and the power structure of science // Research on Chemical Intermediates. 2014. N 40. P. 2785–2798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-013-1128-x

Lynch K., Ivancheva M. Academic freedom and the commercialisation of universities: a critical ethical analysis // Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics. 2016. N 15. P. 1–15

Puritty Ch. et al. Without inclusion, diversity initiatives may not be enough // Science. 2017. N0. 357. P. 1101–1102. DOI:10.1126/science.aai9054

Rannastu-Avalos M., Siiman L. A. Challenges for Distance Learning and Online Collaboration in the Time of COVID-19: Interviews with Science Teachers // Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing. CollabTech. 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol 12324. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58157-2_9

Shannon C. E. A Mathematical Theory of Communication // Bell System Technical Journal. 1948. Vol. 27. P. 379–423. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Wolbring G., Lillywhite A. Equity/equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in universities: the case of disabled people // Societies. 2021. N 11 (2). P. 49.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kashina M., Vasilyeva V., Tkach S. Sociological Conceptualization of the Concept of “Driver” in the Context of Solving Problems of Development of Socio-Humanitarian Research at Russian Universities // Administrative Consulting. 2024. no. 3. P. 162–178. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-3-162-178

Коды статьи

  • EDN GKDAIV
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)