"The Trouble with Bias" in Neural Networks: Conflict and Ethical Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-5-150-158Keywords:
neural network, the trouble with bias, ethics, conflict, classification politics, cultural violenceAbstract
This article is devoted to the analysis of ethical and conflict challenges related to the trouble with bias in neural networks. The necessity of a correct, scientifically based explication of the phenomenon of bias is postulated in order to build models correcting this problem as a necessary element of the software development process based on artificial intelligence algorithms. The history of the development of neural networks is considered from the origin of the idea of a mechanical organism to the construction of modern models of an artificial neuron. The most significant characteristics of modern neural networks are highlighted: architecture, weights and offsets, activation functions, inferences, and learning methods.A detailed description of natural language as a neural network learning resource is given, and programming in natural language is analyzed. The specificity of the natural language of the neural network as a set of linguistic practices reflecting the entire digitized experience of mankind, including stereotypes, inequalities, hate speech and other phenomena, ultimately producing the trouble with bias, is emphasized.Considerable attention is paid to the analysis of the phenomena of “politics classification”, “power discourse”, “cultural violence” in the context of the search for methodological foundations of natural language filtering and censorship strategies in the process of constructing a neural network.Separately, it is emphasized how the errors in neural networks are reflected in the existing ethical and conflict studies debates around the problem of artificial intelligence. It is concluded that the current assessment of the moral aspects of the problem does not imply granting neural networks the status of a moral agent and places the ethical expertise of the product on its developers. It is particularly noted that the conflict aspect of the trouble with bias lies in its recognition exclusively in relation to groups that have now acquired the “sensitive” status of discriminated against as a result of social conflicts.In conclusion, the paper substantiates the urgent need to optimize artificial intelligence in order to reduce the destructive potential of the trouble with bias, which necessarily implies the modification of social relations in the broader context of the struggle of excluded groups for the right to be recognized as discriminated against.Agencies
Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 23-28-00220, https://rscf.ru/project/23-28-00220.Downloads
References
Григоренко Е. В. Философские концепции естественного языка // Общество: философия, история, культура. 2019. № 7 (63). С. 27–31. DOI: 10.24158/fik.2019.7.4
Клышинский Э. С. Проблемы обработки естественного языка в диалоговых системах / Э. С. Клышинский, Ю. А. Жеребцова, А. В. Чижик // Системный администратор. 2019. № 10. С. 82–91.
Конференция «Путешествие в мир искусственного интеллекта» // KREMLIN.RU: Офиц. сайт Президента России. 24 ноября 2023 года [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https:// http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/72811 (дата обращения: 01.12.2023).
Кроуфорд К. Атлас искусственного интеллекта: руководство для будущего. М. : АСТ, 2023. 320 с.
Мораль и этические ценности ChatGPT: есть ли у ИИ четкая нравственная позиция? [Электронный ресурс] // UNN.RU: Офиц. сайт Университета Лобачевского. 12 марта 2024 года. URL: https://fil.unn.ru/does-ai-have-strong-moral-compass (дата обращения: 01.04.2024).
Созыкин А. В. Обзор методов обучения глубоких нейронных сетей // Вестник ЮУрГУ. Сер.: Вычислительная математика и информатика. 2017. Т. 6 (3). С. 28–59. DOI: 10.14529/cmse170303
Сунами А. Н. Этика виртуальной реальности в работе Дэвида Чалмерса 2022 г. «Реальность+. Виртуальные миры и проблемы философии» // Философия истории философии. Т. 4. 2024.
Фуко М. Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. Работы разных лет. М. : Касталь, 1996. 446 с.
Bowker G. C. / G. C. Bowker, S. L. Star // Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 1999. 377 p.
Brown T. B. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners / T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder [et al.]. 2020. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165
Chalmers D. J. Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy. New-York : W. W. Norton & Co, 2022. 544 p.
Du M. Shortcut Learning of Large Language Models in Natural Language Understanding / M. Du, F. He, N. Zou [et al.] // Communications of the ACM. 2023. Vol. 67 (1). P. 110–120. DOI: 10.1145/3596490
Galtung J. Cultural Violence // Journal of Peace Research. 1990. Vol. 27 (3). P. 291–305.
Kejriwal M. Quantifying Gender Disparity in Pre-Modern English Literature using Natural Language Processing / M. Kejriwal, A. Nagaraj // Journal of Data Science. 2024. Vol. 22 (1). P. 77–96. DOI: 10.6339/23-JDS1100
Krügel S. ChatGPT’s inconsistent moral advice influences users’ judgment / S. Krügel, A. Ostermaier, M. Uhl // Sci Rep 13. 4569. 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31341-0
McCulloch W. S. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity / W. S. McCulloch, W. Pitts // The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 1943. Vol. 5 (4). P. 115–133. DOI: 10.1007/BF02478259
Pitt J. C. “Guns Don’t Kill, People Kill”; Values in and/or Around Technologies / P. Kroes, P.-P. Verbeek (eds.) // The moral status of technical artefacts. Philosophy of engineering and technology. Berlin : Springer, 2014. P. 89–102. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7914-3_6
Schmidhuber J. Deep Learning in Neural Networks: an Overview // Neural Networks. 2015. Vol. 1. P. 85–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003
Searle J. Minds, brains, and programs // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1980. Vol. 3 (3). P. 417–24. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00005756
Singer P. Animal Liberation Now: The Definitive Classic Renewed. New-York : Harper Perennial, 2023. 368 p.
Verbeek P.-P. Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2011. 183 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sunami A.N., Musaev A.I.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN UCLTCT
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)