State Instruments of Protectionism in Russian Industrial Policy: Theory and Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2024-6-128-136Keywords:
protectionism, industry, politics, practice, tools, problemsAbstract
The article examines the specifics and features of protectionism in Russian modern management. Special attention is paid to the tools with which the authorities manage a complex industrial structure. The emphasis is placed on the fact that industrial policy is the most important direction in terms of strategic objectives and in the long term. The traditional theory of protectionism is used as the theoretical basis of the study. The article highlights the fact that, as in any country, in Russia the viability of the industrial production sector plays a crucial role, and its importance in the growth of national production can hardly be overestimated. The objectives of protectionism in Russian industry, which are important for the protection of domestic production, as well as GDP growth, are considered. In addition, the instruments of protectionism stimulate the ability to protect the industrial sector from external factors, thereby reducing the consequences. The concept of protectionism in theoretical discourse is defined from different points of view. But the main point of contact in various definitions is the definition of protectionism as a whole state policy, both in theory and in practice, which restricts imports from other countries by applying international sanctions using various methods. Such methods include import restrictions, quotas and others with the main purpose of protecting local industry by restricting the sale of foreign goods on the market. The purpose of the article is to identify the main methods of state regulation in the industrial sector from the point of view of protectionism tools. The subject of the study is the theoretical and practical foundations of protectionist policy in modern Russia. The methods that were applied in the work will include a theoretical overview, a method of analysis, deduction, generalization. The result of the work are generalizing conclusions describing the most effective ways and directions of Russia's industrial policy in the context of protectionism, comparing their theoretical foundations with practical application. The article considers several cases that help to identify the problems of modern industrial management policy. Among such obvious problems, it is worth highlighting the insufficient level of orientation to the new driving forces of technological change, the presence of a high degree of separation of the political landscape, and the low level of selection of successful practices.Downloads
References
Гринберг Р. С., Комолов О. О. Политика протекционизма в России: новые тенденции в контексте проблемы импорта институтов // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2022. Т. 15. № 2. С. 44–54.
Дзюба А. Н., Балакай О. Б. Политика протекционизма и механизмы ее реализации // Материалы Международной научной конференции студентов и молодых ученых. Посвящена 80-летию ДонНУ. Т. 7 / под общ. ред. С. В. Беспаловой. Донецк, 2017. С. 26–28.
Загашвили В. С. Зарубежный опыт импортозамещения и возможные выводы для России [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://institutiones.com/general/2886-zarubezhnyi-opyt-importozamezcheniya.html (дата: обращения: 28.07.2024).
Камынин В. Д., Запарий В. В. О «новой индустриальной истории» (к постановке вопроса) // История науки и техники. Екатеринбург, 2019. № 1. С. 96–97.
Колесникова Т. В. Направления применения протекционизма в российской экономической политике / Т. В. Колесникова, В. В. Лукашевич, П. Н. Соколова // Экономика и предпринимательство. 2022. № 10 (147). С. 250–254.
Когденко В. Г. Трансформация российской экономической модели: признаки и индикаторы // Финансы и кредит. М., 2023. Т. 22. № 3. С. 402–425.
Ленин В. И. Очередные задачи Советской власти, 1918 // Ленин В. И. Полн. собр. соч. Т. 36. М. : Издательство политической литературы, 1974. С. 241–280.
Лист Ф. Национальная система политической экономии. Челябинск : Социум, 2017. 453 с.
Логвиненко М. В. Подходы к торговой политике: либерализм и протекционизм на примере деятельности ЕАЭС // Самоуправление. М., 2020. Т. 2. № 1 (118). С. 243–246.
Нагиева А. Х. Протекционизм в политике С. Ю. Витте на посту министра финансов // Студенческий электронный журнал «СтРИЖ». Волгоград, 2022. № 3 (44). С. 99–102.
Немоляева А. А. Сущность и основные черты политики протекционизма // Научные исследования XXI века. Люберцы, 2023. № 2 (22). С. 147–149.
Политическая экономия [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://ru.wikipedia.org/ (дата обращения: 08.07.2024).
Страгис Ю. П. Неразвитость стран и регионов: факторы развития // Сб. докладов молодых ученных XIV Международной конференции «Российские регионы в фокусе перемен». Екатеринбург, 2020. С. 733–734.
Страгис Ю. П. Протекционизм как фактор развития национальной экономики // Материалы XIII международной конференции «Российские регионы в фокусе перемен». Екатеринбург, 2019. С. 343–347.
Amiti M., Redding S. J., Weinstein D. E. The Impact of the Trade war on U. S. Prices and Wealfare // NBER Working Paper N 25672. March 2019. 37 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w25672 (accessed: 28.07.2024). DOI: 10.3386/w25672
Aftershock. The Pervasive Eects of Taris Hikes // The Economist Intelligence Unit. London. 2019. 41 p.
Baughman L. M., Francois J. F. Trade and American Jobs. The Impact of Trade on U. S. and State-Level Employment. 2019 Update // Trade Partnership Worldwide. February 2019. 24 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://tradepartnership.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Tradeand-American-2019-FINAL.pdf (accessed: 29.07.2024).
Fajgelbaum P. D., Goldberg P. K., Kennedy P. J., Khadelwal A. K. The Return to Protectionism // NBER Working paper N 25638. October 2019. 81 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w25638 (accessed: 20.07.2024). DOI: 10.3386/w25638
Kuandykova M. B., Omarbakiyev L. A., Nizamdinova A. K. Prices for domestic agricultural products and protectionism as an instrument of state regulation // Problems of agrimarket. 2022. N 3. P. 64–71.
Grossman G. M., Helpman E. The politics of free-trade agreements // American Economic Review. July 2022 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=226765 (accessed: 29.07.2024).
Protectionism: Examples and Types of Trade Protections // Investopedia. May 2024 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/protectionism.asp (accessed: 29.07.2024).
Kopf D. The history of US protectionism, in one 230-year chart // Quartz. March 2018 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://qz.com/1230399/a-history-of-taris-us-protectionism-in-one-230-year-chart/ (accessed: 30.07.2024).
World Tariff Profiles 2018 // World Trade Organization [Electronic resource]. URL: https://unc-tad.org/system/files/official-document/wto2018_en.pdf (accessed: 29.07.2024).
York E. Tariff Tracker: Tracking the Economic Impact of the Trump-Biden Tariffs // Tax Foundation. June 2024 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/trump-tariffs-biden-tariffs (accessed: 20.07.2024).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rashchikov A.A.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN ZZFWXI
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)