Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Policy of Implementing Infrastructure Projects in the Region (Using the Example of the Amur Region)

Authors

  • M.I. Privalov Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Автор

Keywords:

regional policy, economic development, socio-economic indicators, synthetic control method, public administration, amur region

Abstract

Relevance. The study is devoted to the analysis of the possibility of using the synthetic control method to assess the effectiveness of policies for the implementation of large projects. The Amur region has been selected for the study, where in recent years the construction of a gas processing plant has been underway, which is an important link in the technological supply of natural gas to China via the Power of Siberia gas pipeline, and the main stage of construction of the Vostochny cosmodrome has been completed. Objective. To evaluate the policy effectiveness of large-scale infrastructure projects on the development of Amur region. Hypothesis. The development experience of each region is unique, especially considering the implementation of large infrastructure projects. Development requires an assessment of the optimality of management decisions and the resources used, for which a number of modern methodological tools have been developed. It is assumed that the impact of projects on development is positive, they serve as a multiplier of growth, but this is not obvious for Russian regions, since previously such effects have not been sufficiently studied. Method. The study employs the synthetic control method, which enables the creation of a counterfactual regional development scenario for comparison. The method was implemented using Python programming language in Jupyter Notebook environment. This method is particularly relevant for the study as it provides an empirical evaluation of government decision effectiveness during large-scale economic transformations, offering clear interpretability and reliability through statistical verification of results. This marks the first application of the method for analyzing indicators in Amur Region.The results may prove valuable for shaping regional policies and for research in public administration and sectoral regulation of other Russian regions. The study demonstrates significant growth in key indicators such as gross regional product and average monthly nominal wages since 2018, with statistical verification of the obtained data. This growth is associated with effective regional policies for infrastructure project implementation. Key conclusion. The study confirms the applicability of the synthetic control method for assessing policy impacts when examining unique interventions, such as the infrastructure projects implemented in Amur region in recent years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • M.I. Privalov, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

    Mikhail I. Privalov, Postgraduate Student, Department of Political Science and Political Management, Faculty of Political Studies, Institute of Social Sciences

    Moscow

References

Андреев В. А. Применение преференциальных режимов на Дальнем Востоке России: оправдываются ли ожидания? // ЭТАП: экономическая теория, анализ, практика. 2021. № 6. С. 41-50. DOI 10.24412/2071-6435-2021-6-41-50. EDN HAVFTN

Бреславский А. С. Урбанизация российского Дальнего Востока: Амурская область в 1989– 2019 гг // Oriental Studies. 2021. Т. 14, № 1. С. 87–102. DOI 10.22162/2619-0990-2021-53-1-87-102. EDN HKZNEE

Гамбарян М. Г. Мониторинг и оценка политики противодействия потреблению табака: международные практики. Часть 3. Оценка эффективности антитабачных мер: прогностические модели и методы естественного эксперимента // Профилактическая медицина. 2023. Т. 26, № 8. С. 15–21. DOI 10.17116/profmed20232608115. EDN GPMRAJ

Данилова Е. А. Инфраструктурные проекты как инструмент обеспечения политической стабильности в контексте интересов национальной безопасности // Власть. 2024. Т. 32, № 6. С. 153–160. DOI 10.24412/2071-5358-2024-6-153-160. EDN FWPTGQ

Демьяненко А. Н. Трансграничные регионы Дальнего Востока: общее и специфичное // Ойкумена. Регионоведческие исследования. 2024. № 4 (71). С. 26–37. DOI 10.29039/1998-6785/2024-4/26-37. EDN XKMZWZ

Ключевые проблемы развития проекта «Сила Сибири» / А. Э. Конторович, Л.В. Эдер, И.В. Филимонова, С. М. Никитенко // Регион: Экономика и Социология. 2017. № 1 (93). С. 190–212. DOI 10.15372/REG20170109. EDN VVEZQV

Назукина М. В. Мифы и реальность дальневосточного регионализма: внешний образ и идентичность макрорегиона // Известия Российской академии наук. Серия географическая. 2021. Т. 85, № 2. С. 195–204. DOI 10.31857/S2587556621020114. EDN SNNFRN.

Потехина Е. В., Фаминская М. В. Оценка влияния «антитабачного» Закона на уровень курения в России: метод синтетического контроля // Социальная политика и социология. 2019. Т. 18, № 4 (133). С. 73–85. DOI 10.17922/2071-3665-2019-18-4-73-85. EDN FUOWZT

Севастьянов С.В., Кравчук А. А. Ускоренное развитие Арктики и Дальнего Востока: синергия проектов // Ойкумена. Регионоведческие исследования. 2019. № 4 (51). С. 7–20. DOI 10.24866/1998-6785/2019-4/7-20. EDN BVBOXK

Склярова С.А. Цифровизация агропромышленного комплекса Дальнего Востока как один из приоритетов государственной политики // Ойкумена. Регионоведческие исследования. 2021. № 4 (59). С. 24–38. DOI 10.24866/1998-6785/2021-4/24-38. EDN VZAADU

Фомин М.В. Пространственное развитие регионов Приамурья: социальный аспект / М.В. Фомин, В.А. Безвербный, И.А. Селезнев [и др.] // Проблемы Дальнего Востока. 2021. № 3. C. 160–174. DOI: 10.31857/S013128120015435-9.

Чжоу Т. Деятельность предприятий с китайским капиталом в Амурской области в 1990-е гг. в контексте социально-экономической ситуации на Дальнем Востоке России // Вестник Томского государственного университета. История. 2019. № 60. С. 125–130. DOI 10.17223/19988613/60/18. EDN SJZGYS

Шевченко К.В. Стратегический анализ рынка труда Амурской области (данные интернетплатформ HeadHunter и SuperJob) // Экономика промышленности. 2022. Т. 15, № 2. С. 234–242. DOI 10.17073/2072-1633-2022-2-234-242. EDN GVKJAU

Abadie A., Diamond A., Hainmueller J. Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2010. Vol. 105. N 490. P. 493–505. DOI 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746.

Abadie A., Gardeazabal J. The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country // American Economic Review. 2003. Vol. 93, N 1. P. 113–132. DOI 10.1257/000282803321455188.

Abadie A. Using Synthetic Controls: Feasibility, Data Requirements, and Methodological Aspects // Journal of Economic Literature. 2021. Vol. 59, N 1. P. 391–425. DOI 10.1257/jel.20191450.

Chen Z.H., & Haynes K.E. Impact of High-Speed Rail on Regional Economic Disparity in China // Journal of Transport Geography. 2017. N 65. P. 80-91. DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.003.

Estimating the effect of Russia’s development policy in the Far Eastern region: The synthetic control approach / A. Goryunov, E. Ageshina, I. Lavrentev, P. Peretyatko // Applied Econometrics. 2023. N 4 (72). P. 59–73. DOI 10.22394/1993-7601-2023-72-58-72. EDN MZPYWQ

Johnson K., Collins D., Wandersman A. Developing a sustainability readiness strategy for health systems: Toolkit, interactive tools, and virtual support system // Evaluation and Program Planning. 2023. N 97. P. 102241. DOI 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102241.

Kaul A., Klößner S., Pfeifer G. Synthetic Control Methods: Never Use All Pre-Intervention Outcomes as Economic Predictors // Economics Letters. 2015. Vol. 136. P. 29–32. DOI 10.1016/j.econlet.2015.08.025.

Kumar A., Awad A.I., Sharma G., et al. Artificial intelligence and blockchain for quantum satellites and UAV-based communications: a review // Quantum Mach. Intell. 2025. N 7. P. 45. DOI 10.1007/s42484-025-00271-7.

Pei-Chien Lin, Ling-Yu Chen. Assessing the Growth Effect of Common Currency Adoption: Synthetic Control Approach // Journal of Finance and Economics. 2017. N 5 (6). P. 269–280. DOI 10.12691/jfe-5-6-3.

Rodríguez-Pose A. The Rise of Populism and the Revenge of the Places That Don’t Matter // LSE Public Policy Review. 2020. Vol. 1 (1), N 4. P. 1–9. DOI https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.4.

Xu X., Zheng M. High-speed rail construction and urban innovation disparity in China: the role of internet development // Econ Change Restruct. 2023. N 56. P. 3567–3599. DOI 10.1007/s10644-023-09542-4.

Zhou J., Raza A. and Sui H. Infrastructure investment and economic growth quality: empirical analysis of China’s regional development // Applied Economics. 2021. N 53 (23). P. 2615–2630. DOI 10.1080/00036846.2020.1863325.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Privalov M. Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Policy of Implementing Infrastructure Projects in the Region (Using the Example of the Amur Region) // Administrative Consulting. 2025. no. 4. P. 107–122.

Коды статьи

  • EDN LUNPLZ
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)