Public and International Division of Labour in Scientific Discourse on the Problems of Modern Economic Development

Authors

  • I. V. Boiko Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации, Северо-Западный институт управления Автор

Keywords:

национальная экономическая идентичность, national comparative advantage, complementarity, convergence, technological development, national economic identity

Abstract

TIntroduction. The development of an international division of labor (IDL), which supports complementarity and convergence between different countries is one of the key prerequisite for increasing resilience of the global economy.The purpose of this article is to explain why the destruction of the basic principles of the international division of labor enforce the world economic problems.Methodology. The author presents the original research methodology for studying international trade relations and explains why “national comparative advantage” is fundamental for the harmonization of international economic relations. Method of analysis: a historical and logical, scientific one abstraction, system support, induction and deduction.Results. The depth of technological processing is a key factor in the further development of IDL and, on this basis, in strengthening the centripetal movement between countries and regions. The article presents a critical analysis of the “old international division of labor” and the “new international division of labor” theories. The article also analysis the IDL, configurated by industries and by space, explaining the contradictions between them that threaten national economic sovereignty and enforces trade contradictions between the different countries. The article presents symptoms indicating a destruction of the principles of IDL, explains the increasing role of the spatial IDL.Conclusion. The principles of the international complementarity and convergence are better realized in a case of spatial international division of labor, which, in turn, represents the main condition for the sustainable growth of the world economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Бойко И. В. Экономика как система. Основы : учебник. М. : Инфра-Инженерия, 2026.

Киреева А. В. Преимущества и недостатки международного разделения труда // Гуманитарные, социально-экономические и общественные науки. 2025. № 4. C. 226–231. DOI 10.24412/2220-2404-2025-4-11; EDN ITUFOK

Островитянов К. В. Политическая экономия. М. : Наше Завтра, 1954.

Шишков Ю. В. Эволюция теорий международного разделения труда // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2009. № 2. C. 13–18. EDN JVYHWB

Becker A., Hottenrott H., Mukherjee A. Division of labor in R&D? Firm size and specialization in corporate research // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2022. Vol. 194. P. 1–23. DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.006

Boiko I. V. Technological reconstruction of the global economy // Globalization. London : IntechOpen, 2019. P. 1–23. DOI:10.5772/intechopen.75096

Charnock G., Starosta G. Introduction: The New International Division of Labour and the Critique of Political Economy Today // The New International Division of Labour. London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. P. 1–22. DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-53872-7_1

Eltis W. The Classical Theory of Economic growth. Second Edition. Palgrave, 2000.

Greenlaw St., Shapiro D., Taylor T. Principles of Microeconomics for AP Courses. 12th Media Services, 2017.

Lim K. F. International Division of Labor // The International Encyclopedia of geography: People, the Earth, Environment, and Technology. Wiley-Association of American Geographers. 2015. P. 1–4. DOI 10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg1035

Meeteren M., Kleibert J. The global division of labour as enduring archipelago: thinking through the spatiality of ‘globalisation in reverse’ // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2022. Vol. 15, Iss. 2. P. 389–406. DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsac007

Morgan K. J. The Exaggerated death of geography [Электронный ресурс] // Geography. 2004. Vol. 1. P. 32–39. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291850331_The_exaggerated_death_of_geography (дата обращения: 13.09.2025).

Munger M. Division of Labor [Электронный ресурс] // EconLib. URL: https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/DivisionofLabor.html (дата обращения: 27.10.2025).

Petras J. A New International Division of Labour? // MERIP. 1981. No. 94. P. 28–30. DOI 10.2307/3012258

Smith A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London, 1776.

Tyrdon M. International division of labour in the context of globalisation: The case of the Czech Republic // Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. 2010. Vol. 5 (14). Р. 359–369.

Veckov M. What would we do without division of labour? [Электронный ресурс] 2022. URL: https://www.adamsmithworks.org/speakings/veckov-division-of-labor-innovation (дата обращения: 26.10.2025).

Zhang X., Fan J. The Basis for the International Division of Labor and International Trade Is Absolute Rather than Comparative Advantage // Theory and Empirical Evidence. World Review of Political Economy. 2024. Vol. 15 (3). P. 338–373. DOI 10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.15.3.0338

Downloads

Published

2026-03-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Boiko I.V. Public and International Division of Labour in Scientific Discourse on the Problems of Modern Economic Development // Administrative Consulting. 2026. Vol. 1, no. 3. P. 83–94.