Strategic Guidelines for the Development of the Public Authorities Communication Policy in the Information Society

Authors

  • S.A. Shtrikov Synergy Group JSC Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-1-43-55

Keywords:

COMMUNICATION policy, strategic development, information society, knowledge society, sustainable development

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to critically analyze the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017-2030. The theoretical basic of the analysis are the theory of information society and communicative theory of power. Having a rich explanatory potential and based on the large-scale empirical research, these theories comprehensively characterize the main elements of the existing socio-economic system in their relationship with political action. Thus they contribute to the development of practical recommendations for public authorities. Methodologically, this study is based on the structural and contextual analysis of the text, carried out with the help of MAXQDA (n=225) and allows to reveal the importance of key parameters of communication policy in the information society and their relations with each other. The results of the study show that the Strategy reflects all the key parameters of communication policy in the information society, like: the digitalization of individual, organizational and spatial development; the formation of legal and institutional foundations of the knowledge society at the international level; the introduction of artificial intelligence and big data based decision making in science, industry, business, and in governance; the transformations in administration and management and the formation of new competences in the information society's stakeholders. However, the Strategy makes a very strong emphasis on security issues. This refers to the extensive elements of the development of communication policy of public authorities. Contemporary studies research shows, that the restrictive development is a critical element that prevents the formation of an effective communication policy of public authorities in the information society. The article substantiates the conclusion that it is expedient to change the connotation of the security concept, and to understand it in terms of sustainable development. Sustainable development should serve as a strategic reference point for the state communication policy in order to develop the information society in contemporary Russia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Алиев В. М. Политико-правовые аспекты перехода к цифровой экономике в России // Российский следователь. 2018. № 9. С. 48-52.

Балашов А. И., Рогова Е. М., Рудская И. А. Формирование региональной инновационной системы в Санкт-Петербурге // Экономическое возрождение России. 2015. № 1 (43). С. 96-114.

Гохберг Л. М. (ред.) Что такое цифровая экономика? Тренды, компетенции, измерение2019. URL: https://issek.hse.ru/press/264581421.html (дата обращения: 10.07.2019).

Земцов С. П. Потенциальная роботизация и экономика незнания в регионах России. XIX Апр. междунар. науч. конф. по проблемам развития экономики и общества. М.: НИУ ВШЭ. URL: https://conf.hse. ru/2018/program. (дата обращения: 28.07.2019).

Кривошапко Ю. РАЭК: Аудитория Рунета достигла 92,8 миллиона человек// RG.RU-Digital. 17.04.2019. URL: https://rg.ru/2019/04/17/raek-auditoriia-runetadostigla-928-milliona-chelovek.html (дата обращения: 10.07.2019).

Кузнецов П. У. Концептуальные условия государственной политики в сфере цифровой трансформации общества // Российское право. 2018. № 6. C. 12-16.

Меньшиков П. В. Коммуникация как управленческая функция современного государства // Право и управление XXI век. 2017. № 3. С. 81-90.

Шамахов В. А., Балашов А. И. Новая общественно-политическая нормальность и уроки модернизации постсоветской системы государственного управления // Управленческое консультирование. 2016. № 12 (96). С. 6-15.

Angelidou M. Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities. 2014. N 41. Р. 3-11.

Beniger J. R. The control revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1986.

Castells M., Cardoso G. The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy. Washington DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations, 2006.

Cath C., Wachter S., Mittelstadt B., Taddeo M., Floridi L. Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society': the US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engeneering Ethics. 2017. P. 1-24.

Csikszentmihalyi M. Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity. In: The Systems Model of Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht. 2014. Р. 47-61.

Degryse C. Digitalisation of the economy and its impact on labour markets, Working Paper N 2016.02, European Trade Union Institute (ETUI).

Eskens S., Helberger N., Moeller J. Challenged by news personalisation: five perspectives on the right to receive information. Journal of Media Law. 2017. N 9 (2). Р. 259-284.

Goldfinch S. Pessimism, computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector. Public Administration Review. 2007. N 67 (5). P. 917-929.

Martin W. The global information society. Aldershot: Gower. 1995.

Roztocki N., Weistroffer H. R. Information technology success factors and models in developing and emerging economies. Information Technology for Development. N 17 (3). 2011. P. 163-167.

Sassen S. Towards a sociology of information technology. Current Sociology. 2002. N 50 (3). Р. 365-88.

Slevin J. The Internet and Society. Cambridge: Polity. 2000.

Steyn J., Johanson G. (Eds.). ICTs and sustainable solutions for the digital divide: Theory and perspectives. Hershey: Idea Group. 2010.

Tjoa A. M., Tjoa S. The Role of ICT to Achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). In: Mata F., Pont A. (eds) ICT for Promoting Human Development and Protecting the Environment. WITFOR 2016. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Vol. 481. Springer, Cham. 2016. Р. 3-13.

Tsekeris C. Industry 4.0 and the digitalisation of society: Curse or cure? Homo Virtualis. 2018.1 (1). P. 4-12.

Van den Bulck H. Tracing media policy decisions: Of stakeholders, networks and advocacy coalitions. In: Price M et al. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Media Law. London: Routledge. 2012. Р. 17-34.

Van den Bulck H. Old Ideas Meet New Technologies: Will Digitalisation Save Public Service Broadcasting (Ideals) From Commercial Death? Sociology Compass. 2007. N 1 (1). Р. 28-40.

Wilhelm A. Digital Nation, Towards an Inclusive Information Society. Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press. 2004.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shtrikov S. Strategic Guidelines for the Development of the Public Authorities Communication Policy in the Information Society // Administrative Consulting. 2020. no. 1. P. 43–55. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-1-43-55