Transformational Leadership as a Source of Participatory Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-191-200Keywords:
трансформация государственного управления, municipal management, participatory approach, transformation of public administrationAbstract
The purpose of this article is to justify the new role of the municipal official, i.e. the role of a transformation leader, whose activity is increasingly connected with the introduction of participatory governance, with the development of citizen participation and through this participation, progressive changes in the local community and the municipality as a whole. The method of research was theoretical analysis of foreign experience in the use of social technologies at the local level, which made it possible to form a theoretical model of transformational leadership. The formation of such a model is important from the point of view of developing key competencies of municipal officials in the near future. Empirical support for the theoretical analysis was obtained through content analysis of documents published on the website of the Governor of St. Petersburg (https://www. gov.spb.ru/governor). The research made it possible to conclude that transformational leadership behavior of municipal authorities is aimed at increasing the participatory nature of governance, the mission of valence in the ratio of clear and attractive development priorities at the municipal, regional and federal levels with the interests of local communities. The constant need to solve new social and political problems and contradictions by municipal leaders means a continuous search for a balance between efficiency and fairness, and the effectiveness of this balance depends on the transformational potential of municipal managers. The participatory style of municipal management implies that transformation leaders use social technologies for public participation in state and municipal management. Transformational leadership is based on the principles of democracy, efficiency, effectiveness, openness, rule of law, ethics, competence, innovation, sustainability, performance, and accountability. It makes it possible to replenish the deficit of public resources, which is increasing due to economic crises, as well as unjustified and excessive expansion of social services and the number of their recipients. Transformative leadership involves reaching consensus among different social groups, finding a balance between economic rationality and social justice, between extensive growth and environmentally friendly sustainable development. This becomes the main task of any level of government, primarily the municipal government as the closest to the place where problems arise and the search for optimal solutions.Downloads
References
Агеева А. Н. Партисипативные социальные технологии принятия муниципальных управленческих решений в зарубежных странах // Juvenis scientia. 2017. № 8. С. 38-41.
Аллегретти Д., Реке А., Сентоме И., Херцберг К. Партисипативный бюджет: разнообразие форм и моделей // Муниципалитет: экономика и управление. 2013. № 2. С. 5-23.
Гидденс Э. Ускользающий мир: как глобализация меняет нашу жизнь. М.: Весь мир, 2004.
Ерашова О. В. Вопросы стратегического развития муниципальных образований // Вестник Самарского муниципального института управления. 2016. № 1. С. 39-44.
Закирова Ю. А., Хуснутдинова С. Р., Касимова А. Р. Методика партисипативного проектирования городской среды в современном российском градостроительстве // Известия КазГАСУ. 2016. № 1 (35). С. 81-86.
Карлина А. А., Рязанов Д. И. Партисипативные принципы публичного управления социально-экономическим развитием города // Вестник Самарского муниципального института управления. 2016. № 4. С. 44-51.
Лапыгин Ю. Н., Лапыгин Д. Ю. Управленческие решения. М.: Эксмо, 2009.
Перезолова А. С. Практики партисипативного управления в публичной политике // Вестник РУДН. Сер.: Политология. 2018. № 1. С. 122-130.
Садовникова Н. П., Санжапов Б. Х., Парыгин Д. С., Гнедкова Е. П. Партисипативное управление развитием города. Механизмы реализации на основе информационных технологий // Биосферная совместимость: Человек, регион, технологии. 2013. № 3. С. 80-85.
Сергеева С. Ю. Динамика социальной активности объединений граждан в современной России. Итоги экспертного опроса // Вестник Международного института рынка. 2016. № 1. С. 137-143.
Шамахов В. А., Балашов А. И. Новая общественно-политическая нормальность и уроки модернизации постсоветской системы государственного управления // Управленческое консультирование. 2016. № 12. С. 6-15.
Ansell C., Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008. 18. P. 543-571.
Aragonès E., Sanchéz-Pagés S. A Model of Participatory Democracy: Understanding the Case of Porto Alegre. European Economic Review.2005. 53 (1). P. 1-43.
Bardhan P., Mookherjee D. Capture and governance at local and national levels. American Economic Review. 2000. 90 (2). P. 135-139.
Barnes M., Newman J., Knops A., Sullivan H. Constituting "the public" in public participation. Public Administration. 2003. 81. P. 379-399.
Borja J., Castells M. Local and Global. The Management of Cities in the Information Age. London: Earthscan & Habitat, 1997.
Boulding C., Wampler B. Voice, votes, and resources: Evaluating the effect of participatory democracy on well-being. World Development. 2009. 38. 125-135.
DeCaro F. A., Stokes M. K. Public Participation and Institutional Fit: A Social-Psychological Perspective. Ecology and Society. 2013. 18 (4).P. 40.
Fischer F. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment. The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham: Duke University Press, 2000.
Foth M., Brynskov M. Participatory action research for civic engagement. In: Gordon E., Mihailidis P. (eds.). Civic media: Technology, design, practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.
Ganuza E., Baiocchi G. The Power of Ambiguity: How Participatory Budgeting Travels the Globe. Journal of Public Deliberation. 2012. 8 (2). P. 1-12.
Goodhart M., Fung A., Gauri V. Democratic Imperatives: Innovations in Rights, Participation, and Economic Citizenship. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, 2012.
Innes J. E., Booher D. E. (). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice. 2004. 5. (4). P. 419-436.
Kübler D., Rochat P. E., Woo S. Y., van der Heiden N. Strengthen governability rather than deepen democracy: why local governments introduce participatory governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2019.
Kwaja A. I. Can good projects succeed in bad communities? Journal of Public Economics. 2009. 93 (7-8). P. 899-916.
Mahadevia D. Institutionalising spaces for negotiations for the urban poor: New vocabulary for urban planning. Inclusive Urban Planning: State of the Urban Poor Report 2013. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2014.