Topical Agenda for the Study of Values in Foreign Sociology: Topics, Theories, Methodologies

Authors

  • M.A. Kashina Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA) Автор
  • S.V. Lyashko Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA) Автор
  • S. Tkach Herzen State Pedagogical University Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-10-62-82

Keywords:

cluster, quantitative research, scopus, sociology, review, thesaurus, values

Abstract

Research on values is important both for the development of sociology and for. practices of social management, they provide the necessary basis for effective public policy.The purpose of this article was to analyze the current agenda for the study of values by building theoretical and methodological thematic clusters. An optional task was to describe the thematic thesaurus used by the authors of the articles on values. The hypothesis was tested that the theory of social status in relation to economic topics received the greatest recognition in the current agenda. The study was carried out in a quantitative design, the method of content analysis was used, followed by the calculation of the c-correlation coefficient between the three semantic components of the study: topic, theory, methodology. The empirical material was the abstracts of 132 articles published in 21 sociological journals, included in the 1 quartile of Scopus in 2016-2020. Articles were selected according to the author’s search method. The limitations of the study are the 5-year time period, the language of the article (English), the use of only abstract texts for analysis, and not the articles themselves, the author’s method of building clusters (it is possible to build clusters on other grounds).Results. The main hypothesis was confirmed. The strongest connection was recorded between the theory of social status and economic topics (c-correlation coefficient - 0.62). The smallest connection was found between family values and theories about values as ideal representations (0.21). At the same time, the coefficient of connection between theories and research topics is, on average, lower than that of methodologies and topics. Qualitative methodology is mentioned by authors of articles on values a little more often than quantitative one. (114 qualitative versus 103 quantitative). In the thematic thesaurus, the greatest diversity is recorded in the research area “Labor and Economics”, the least - in the areas “Family” and “Education”. Despite the fact that the group of articles dealing with values in the sphere of politics is the second largest in the sample with 87 articles (66%), only 15 frequently used terms were included in its thematic thesaurus. In the area of “Labor and Economics”, 65 significant terms were identified; in total, materials of 111 articles (84%) were attributed to this area.The directions of further research are related to the study of the isomorphism of the agenda for the study of values in international and Russian sociology, as well as the analysis of substantive discrepancies in the study of values in the same sphere of life between Russian and foreign sociologists.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Бауман З. Ретротопия / науч. ред. О. А. Оберемко. М.: ВЦИОМ, 2019. 160 с.

Вебер М. Избранные произведения. М.: Прогресс, 1990. 805 с.

Гарванова М. З. Исследование ценностей в современной психологии // Современная психология: материалы III Междунар. науч. конф. (г. Казань, октябрь 2014 г.). Казань: Бук, 2014. С. 5-20.

Дюркгейм Э. Ценностные и "реальные" суждения // Дюркгейм Э. Социология ее предмет, метод, назначение. М., 1995. С. 286-304.

Кашина М. А., Ткач С. Методологическое разнообразие в российской социологии: анализ исследований ценностей // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Социология. 2021. Т. 14. Вып. 2. С. 107-123.

Луман Н. Дифференциация. М.: Логос, 2006. 320 с.

Миллс Ч. Социологическое воображение. М.: Издательский Дом "Nota Bene", 2001. 264 с.

Парсонс Т. Система современных обществ. М.: Аспект Пресс, 1997. 270 с.

Рокич М. Природа человеческих ценностей // Свободная пресса. 1973. № 5. С. 20-28.

Рэдклифф-Браун А. Р. Структура и функция в примитивном обществе. Очерки и лекции / Российская академия наук. Институт этнологии и антропологии имени Н. Н. Миклухо-Маклая; предисл. Э. Э. Эванс-Причарда и Фрэда Эггана; пер. с англ., комм. и указ. О. Ю. Артемовой при участии Ю. А. Артемовой, А. Г. Артемова; отв. ред. В. А. Попов. М.: Издательская фирма "Восточная литература" РАН, 2001. 304 с.

Сорокин П. А. Человек. Цивилизация. Общество. М.: Политиздат, 1992. 543 с.

Томас У. Методологические заметки / У. Томас, Ф. Знанецкий // Америк. соц. мысль / под ред. В. И. Добренькова. М., 1994. С. 335-337.

Almond G. The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations / G. Almond, S. Verba. Boston: Little Brown, 1965.

Carey H. C. Principles of Social Science. // Philadelphia: Lippencott. 1858. 474 pp.

Coleman L. What is American? // Soc. Forces. 1944. N 19. Р. 492-499.

Gillin J. National and regional cultural values in the United States. // Soc. Forces. 1955. N 34. Р. 107-113.

Kahl J. A. Some measures of achievement orientation. // Am J. Sociol. 1965. N 70. P. 669-681.

Marsh A. The "silent revolution" // Am. Pol Sci. 1975. Rev. 69. P. 21-30.

Myrdal G. An American Dilemma. // NY: Harper. 1944. 1330 p.

Riesman D. The Lonely Crowd. New Haven // CT: Yale Univ. Press. 1950. 386 p.

Slavoj Žižek. Like a Thief in Broad Daylight: Power in the Era of Post-Humanity. N: Allen Lane. 2018. 256 p.

Spates J. L. The Sociology of Values // Annual Review of Sociology. 1983. Vol. 9. P. 27-49.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kashina M., Lyashko S., Tkach S. Topical Agenda for the Study of Values in Foreign Sociology: Topics, Theories, Methodologies // Administrative Consulting. 2021. no. 10. P. 62–82. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-10-62-82