Effective Practices of Macroprudential Stress Testing as a Tool of Increasing the Stability of Russian Financial System in the Context of Macroeconomic Shocks

Authors

  • D. Yu. Desyatnichenko Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA) Автор
  • O.V. Ryabov Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA) Автор
  • O. Yu. Desyatnichenko Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA) Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-12-95-110

Keywords:

macroprudential regulation, banking regulation, macroprudential policy, stress testing models, financial system stability

Abstract

The article examines the evolution of the prudential approach to banking regulation, examines the practical contribution of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to the development and implementation of internationally unified practices and procedures for stress testing and supervision. The authors share the point of view that the existing methods and practices of stress testing still need improvements and methodological improvements, since they regularly allow the practical implementation of adverse scenarios leading to financial shocks and global crises. As a significant disadvantage of many actively used stress testing models, it is noted that they are often focused on complex, highly bureaucratic procedures for the preparation and analysis of financial statements, the main purpose of which is to assess the probabilities and sizes of losses and identify scenarios for the development of the situation for each specific bank, and no risks for the financial system as a whole. The authors come to the conclusion that it is advisable to prioritize the use of alternative stress testing models in crisis and post-crisis conditions, the forecasts within which are based on the actual values of financial market indicators, macroeconomic variables, and other open data. Special attention is paid to the stylized CLASS model, based on simple econometric models, as well as stress testing the current market value of V-lab. Based on the results of the study, the authors come to a number of conclusions that the role of the macroeconomic component in the procedures, methods, and algorithms for macroprudential stress testing used in Russia should increase, the degree of involvement and the sphere of responsibility for its results of key institutional units of the public administration system should expand, and macroprudential stress testing itself should not be limited to supervisory stress testing in everyday practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akinci O., Olmstead-Rumsey J. How effective are macroprudential policies? An empirical investigation // Journal of Financial Intermediation. 2018. N 33. P. 33-57.

Assessing the impact of Basel III: Evidence from macroeconomic models: literature review and simulations // Working Paper 38. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision April 2021. URL: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/wp38.pdf (accessed: 10.01.2021).

Hirtle B., Kovner A., Vickery J., Bhanot M. Assessing Financial Stability: The Capital and Loss Assessment under Stress Scenarios (CLASS) Model // Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports. N 663. February, 2014. Rev. July 2015.

Hirtle B., Kovner A., Vickery J., Bhanot M. Assessing financial stability: The Capital and Loss Assessment under Stress Scenarios (CLASS) model // Journal of Banking & Finance. Vol. 69. Suppl. 1. August 2016. P. S35-S55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.09.021.

Mendicinoa C., Nikolov K., Suarezc J., Supera D. Bank capital in the short and in the long run // Journal of Monetary Economics. Vol. 115. November 2020. P. 64-79.

Cerutti E., Claessens S., Laeven L. The use and effectiveness of macroprudential policies: New evidence // Journal of Financial Stability. 2017. N 28. P. 203-224.

Chortareas G. E., Girardone C., Ventouri A. Bank supervision, regulation, and efficiency: Evidence from the European Union // Journal of Financial Stability. 2012. N 8. P. 292-302.

Chortareas G. E., Girardone C., Ventouri A. Financial freedom and bank efficiency: Evi-dence from the European Union // Journal of Banking & Finance. 2013. N 37. P. 1223-1231.

Clement P. The term "macroprudential": Origins and evolution // BIS Quarterly Review. March 2010.

Demekas D. IMF Working Paper. Designing Effective Macroprudential Stress Tests: Progress So Far and the Way Forward. June 2015. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2015/wp15146.pdf (accessed: 08.08.2021).

Lucas D. Comment on: "Testing macroprudential stress tests: The risk of regulatory risk weights" by Viral Acharya, Robert Engle, and Diane Pierret // Journal of Monetary Economics. Vol. 65. July 2014. P. 54-56.

Distinguin I., Roulet C., Tarazi A. Bank regulatory capital and liquidity: Evidence from US and European publicly traded banks // Journal of Banking and Finance. Vol. 37. Is. 9. September 2013. P. 3295-3317. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.027.

Dávilaa E., Walther A. Does size matter? Bailouts with large and small banks // Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 136. Is. 1. April 2020. P. 1-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.09.005.

Gambacorta L., Murcia A. The impact of macroprudential policies in Latin America: An empirical analysis using credit registry data // Journal of Financial Intermediation. 2020. N 42. Article 100828.

López-Espinosaa G., Rubia A., Valderrama L., Antón M. Good for one, bad for all: Determinants of individual versus systemic risk // Journal of Financial Stability. September 2013. Vol. 9. Is. 3. P. 287-299.

Global systemically important banks: revised assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. July 2018. URL: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d445.pdf (accessed: 08.08.2021).

Gómez E., Murcia A., Lizarazo A., Mendoza J. C. Evaluating the impact of macroprudential policies on credit growth in Colombia // Journal of Financial Intermediation. 2020. N 42. Article 100843.

Hasan I., Koetter M., Wedow M. Regional growth and finance in Europe: Is there a quality effect of bank efficiency? // Journal of Banking & Finance. 2009. N 33. P. 1446-1453.

Vodenskaa I., Aoyama H., Becker A. P. at al. From stress testing to systemic stress testing: The importance of macroprudential regulation // Journal of Financial Stability. February 2021. Vol. 52. Article 100803. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100803.

Peydróa J.-L., Polo A., Sette E. Monetary policy at work: Security and credit application registers evidence // Journal of Financial Economics. June 2021. Vol. 140. Is. 3. P. 789-814. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.008.

Laeven L., Levine R. Bank governance, regulation and risk taking // Journal of Financial Economics. August 2009. Vol. 93. Is. 2. P. 259-275. DOI: idp.nwipa.ru/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.003.

Making supervisory stress tests more macroprudential: Considering liquidity and solvency interactions and systemic risk // Working Paper 29. November 2015. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. URL: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/wp29.pdf (accessed: 08.08.2021).

Meuleman E., Vander Vennet R. Macroprudential policy and bank systemic risk // Journal of Financial Stability. April 2020. Vol. 47. Article 100724.

Kogler M. Risk shifting and the allocation of capital: A Rationale for macroprudential regulation // Journal of Banking and Finance. September 2020. Vol. 118. Article 105890. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105890.

Kupiec P. H. Policy uncertainty and bank stress testing // Journal of Financial Stability. December 2020. Vol. 51. Aricle 100761. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100761.

Principles for sound stress testing practices and supervision // Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Bank for International Settlements. May 2009.

Stress testing principles // Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Bank for International Settlements. October 2018.

Supervisory and bank stress testing: range of practices. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. December 2017. URL: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d427.pdf (accessed: 08.08.2021).

Survey on the interaction of regulatory instruments: results and analysis // Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Working Paper 33. July 2018. URL: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/wp33.pdf (accessed: 08.08.2021).

Breuer Th., Summer M. Systematic stress tests on public data // Journal of Banking and Finance. September 2020. Vol. 118. Article 105886 DOI: 10.1016/jjbankfin.2020.105886.

Acharya V., Engle R., Pierret D. Testing macroprudential stress tests: The risk of regulatory risk weights // Journal of Monetary Economics. July 2014. Vol. 65. P. 36-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.04.014.

Freixas X., Perez-Reyna D. Optimal macroprudential policy and rational bubbles // Journal of Financial Intermediation. April 2021. Vol. 46. Article 100908.

Bakkar Ya., Nyola A. P. Internationalization, foreign complexity and systemic risk: Evidence from European banks // Journal of Financial Stability. August 2021. Vol. 55. Article 100892. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100892.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Desyatnichenko D.Y., Ryabov O., Desyatnichenko O.Y. Effective Practices of Macroprudential Stress Testing as a Tool of Increasing the Stability of Russian Financial System in the Context of Macroeconomic Shocks // Administrative Consulting. 2021. no. 12. P. 95–110. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-12-95-110